Well-formedness
{{Short description|In linguistics, conformity with grammar}}
{{other uses|Well-formed (disambiguation)}}
__NOTOC__
In linguistics, well-formedness is the quality of a clause, word, or other linguistic element that conforms to the grammar of the language of which it is a part. Well-formed words or phrases are grammatical, meaning they obey all relevant rules of grammar. In contrast, a form that violates some grammar rule is ill-formed and does not constitute part of the language.
A word may be phonologically well-formed, meaning it conforms to the sound pattern of the language. For example, the nonce word wug coined by Jean Berko Gleason is phonologically well-formed, so informants are able to pluralize it regularly.{{cite journal |last1=Breiss |first1=Canaan |title=Inside the wug-test: phonological well-formedness and processing costs |date=2021 |url=https://www.cuny2021.io/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/CUNY_2021_abstract_350.pdf |access-date=21 September 2023}} A word, phrase, clause, or utterance may be grammatically well-formed, meaning it obeys the rules of morphology and syntax. A semantically well-formed utterance or sentence is one that is meaningful. Grammatical well-formedness and semantic well-formedness do not always coincide. For example, the following sentence is grammatically well-formed, but has no clear meaning.
:Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.{{cite book|last=Chomsky|first=Noam|authorlink=Noam Chomsky|title=Syntactic Structures|url=https://archive.org/details/syntacticstructu00chom_775|url-access=limited|year=1957|publisher=Mouton|location=The Hague/Paris|page=[https://archive.org/details/syntacticstructu00chom_775/page/n17 15]|isbn=3-11-017279-8}}
The concept of well-formedness was developed in generative grammar during the twentieth century.{{cite book|title=Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction|last=Lyons|first=John|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1996|isbn=0521438772}} Sometimes native speakers of a language do not agree whether a particular word, phrase, or clause is well-formed. This problem of gradient well-formedness, uncertainty about the well-formedness of a particular example, is a problem for generative linguistics, which assumes that grammar follows some universal patterns that should not vary among speakers.
Gradient well-formedness
Gradient well-formedness is a problem that arises in the analysis of data in generative linguistics, in which a linguistic entity is neither completely grammatical nor completely ungrammatical. A native speaker may judge a word, phrase or pronunciation as "not quite right" or "almost there," rather than dismissing it as completely unacceptable or fully accepting it as well-formed. Thus, the acceptability of the given entity lies on a "gradient" between well-formedness and ill-formedness. Some generative linguists think that ill-formedness might be strictly additive, thus trying to figure out universal constraints by acquiring scalar grammaticality judgments from informants. Generally, however, gradient well-formedness is considered an unsolved problem in generative linguistics.
See also
References
{{reflist}}
Further reading
- {{cite book|last=Albright|first=Adam|date=January 2007|title=Gradient phonological acceptability as a grammatical effect|url=https://www.mit.edu/~albright/papers/Albright-GrammaticalGradience.pdf|accessdate=2009-04-11}}
- {{cite book|last=Featherston|first=Sam|year=2004|title=Judgements in syntax: Why they are good, how they can be better|url=http://www.sfb441.uni-tuebingen.de/~sam/papers/DGfS04.handout.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060324080153/http://www.sfb441.uni-tuebingen.de/~sam/papers/DGfS04.handout.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-date=2006-03-24|accessdate=2008-04-09}}
- {{cite book|last1=Hay|first1=Jennifer|last2=Pierrehumbert|first2=Janet|last3=Beckman|first3=Mary|editor=John Local, Richard Ogden & Rosalind Temple|title=Phonetic Interpretation: Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI|year=2004|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-1-139-44992-2|pages=58–74|chapter=Speech perception, well-formedness and the statistics of the lexicon}}
- {{cite book|last=Hayes|first=Bruce|editor=Joost Dekkers|title=Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax, and Acquisition|year=2000|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-823844-7|pages=88–120|chapter=Gradient well-formedness in Optimality Theory|chapter-url=http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/hayes/gradient.pdf|accessdate=2006-09-20}}
- {{cite book|last=Lakoff|first=George|editor=Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovits|title=Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology|year=1971|publisher=CUP Archive|isbn=978-0-521-07822-1|pages=[https://archive.org/details/semanticsinterdi00stei/page/329 329–340]|chapter=Presupposition and relative well-formedness|chapter-url-access=registration|chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/semanticsinterdi00stei/page/329}}
- {{cite thesis|last=Perlmutter|first=David|date=August 19, 1968|title=Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax|type=doctoral dissertation|publisher=M.I.T. Department of Modern Languages and Linguistics|url=http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/13003/26089429-MIT.pdf|access-date=22 September 2016}}
- {{cite journal|last1=Singleton|first1=Jenny|last2=Morford|first2=Jill|last3=Goldin-Meadow|first3=Susan|title=Once is not enough: Standards of well-formedness in manual communication created over three different timespans|journal=Language|volume=69|issue=4|year=1993|pages=683–715|doi=10.2307/416883|jstor=416883 }}