Wheel clamp

Wheel clamps have five main functions:

• To punish unauthorised or illegal parking, in lieu of towing the offending vehicle; in these cases, police or property owners who place the clamp may charge a high "release fee" to remove it
• To enforce unpaid fines previously applied to the vehicle; a certain number of nonpayments or time elapsed from the issuance of the most recent fine results in clamping upon the next violation
• To prevent driving by a suspended driver or moving of a disabled vehicle
• To preclude escape of a prosecuted person
• For security purposes, such as preventing a car, trailer, or caravan from being driven or towed away by a thief

File:1920 Hudson Speedster Touring at 2015 Rockville Show 8of8.jpg]]

As the automobile was introduced and became popular, cars also became a target for thieves and for a new concept that became known as joyriding. A variety of after-market security devices were introduced. An early invention were locking wheel clamps or chocks that owners could shackle onto one of the car's road wheels as a hobble, making it impossible to roll the vehicle unless the entire wheel was removed. Between 1914 and 1925 there were at least 25 patents related to wheel locks that attached on the tire and spoke wheel.{{cite book|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=F8EBAwAAQBAJ&q=Miller-Chapman+Wheel+chock&pg=PA13 |page=9 |title=Stealing Cars: Technology and Society from the Model T to the Gran Torino |first1=John A. |last1=Heitmann |first2=Rebecca H. |last2=Morale |publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press |year=2014 |isbn=9781421412979 |access-date=25 November 2015}} These devices were available in many sizes from a number of manufacturers (including several patented by Miller-Chapman), and became popular during the early 1920s.{{cite web|url= http://www.mtfca.com/discus/messages/80257/82091.html?1256577439 |title=Miller-Chapman wheel locks |year=2009 |work=Model T Ford Forum |access-date=25 November 2015}}{{cite web|url= http://automobileandamericanlife.blogspot.com/2014_02_01_archive.html |title=Automobile Anti-Theft Deterrents, Criminal Countermeasures, and Technological Change, 1900-1970 at the Society of Automotive Historians biennial conference |date=April 2014 |work=Automobile and American Life |access-date=25 November 2015}}

A version of the modern wheel clamp, originally known as the auto immobiliser, was invented in 1944 and patented in 1958 by Frank Marugg.{{cite web|last=Marugg |first=F.P. |date=29 July 1958 |title=Wheel Clamp US patent number 2,844,954 |url=http://www.freepatentsonline.com/2844954.pdf |access-date=1 February 2011}} Marugg was a pattern maker, a violinist with the Denver Symphony Orchestra, and a friend of many Denver politicians and police department officials. The police department needed a solution to a growing parking enforcement problem. The city towed ticketed cars to the pound, where they were often vandalised. Those whose cars were damaged sued the city for losses and the police had to itemize everything in the cars. Dan Stills, head of the city's traffic division, thought an immobilizer would avoid the expensive towing problem and approached Marugg with an idea to improve on the device to keep the cars where they were parked.{{cite book |last=Pohlen |first=Jerome |title=Oddball Colorado: A Guide to Some Really Strange Places |date=2002 |publisher=Chicago Review Press |isbn=9781556524608 |page=[https://archive.org/details/oddballcoloradog0000pohl/page/10 10] |url=https://archive.org/details/oddballcoloradog0000pohl |url-access=registration |quote=Dan Stills immobilizer. |access-date=1 October 2019}}

The Denver police first used the wheel boot on 5 January 1955 and collected over US$18,000 (US${{formatnum:{{Inflation|US|18000|1955|r=-4}}}} in {{Inflation-year|US}} dollars{{inflation-fn|US}}) in its first month of use. Although the wheel boot was first cast in steel, Marugg soon switched to a lighter aluminum-based alloy. Marugg later sold the device to parking lot owners, hotels and ski resorts, as well as a Jumbo version for farm equipment and larger vehicles. The Smithsonian Institution now has a copy of Marugg's boot on display in Washington, D.C.{{cite web|url= http://www.expo1000.com/parking/interviews/denverboot.htm |title=Denver Boot Interview |publisher=Expo1000.com |access-date=13 August 2010}}{{cite journal|title=The Man Who Invented the Denver Boot, Frank P. Marugg and His Infamous Auto Immobilizer |first=Linda |last=Murdock |journal=Colorado Heritage |date=Autumn 2005 |pages=40–47 |quote=article includes bibliography}} By 1970 Marugg had sold 2,000 boots. Although the patent ran out in 1976 and modern car and truck wheels necessitated a redesign, Marugg's daughter kept up the business until 1986. Clancy Systems International later bought the rights to the boot. The boot allowed Denver to maintain one of the largest collection rates for parking fines of any city in the US through its first fifty years. The Denver Sheriff ran the "Boot Trucks" for many years until the detail was transferred to Denver Parking Management.

The best known wheel clamp in the UK is the 'London Wheel Clamp'. The designer, Trevor Whitehouse filed the patent in 1991.{{cite web |title=UK Patent Application GB2251416 (A) |url=http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=GB&NR=2251416A&KC=A&FT=D&date=19920708&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_gb |publisher=Espacenet |access-date=1 October 2019}} He originally called the device the 'Preston', after his home town in Lancashire. Primarily used on private land, its notoriety grew once it was introduced to public roads under the Road Traffic Regulations Act of 1991 (commonly known as the de-criminalising of the yellow lines act). The first areas in the country to be decriminalised were the 33 London Boroughs during 1993/94, hence the name change.

Wheel-clamping is notoriously unpopular with unauthorised parkers. While a traffic warden or police officer has jurisdiction over public roads, in many countries, the law allows landowners to clamp vehicles parking on their property without permission.

One British man became so annoyed at having his car clamped that he removed the clamp with an angle grinder. He subsequently received publicity as a self-styled "superhero" called "Angle-Grinder Man", offering to remove clamps for free with his angle grinder.{{cite web|url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/3112670.stm |title='Superhero' takes on clampers |date=16 September 2003 |publisher=BBC |access-date=11 July 2014}}

Other motorists have cut the clamps off with bolt cutters or even clamping their own cars beforehand so that property owners will be unable to clamp an already-clamped vehicle and may think that another owner has clamped it. However, the practice of removing clamps is usually only done for those that were installed by private parties; the removal of clamps installed by authorities (chiefly the police) is an offence.{{citation needed|date=November 2011}}

A New Zealand wheel clamper made national headlines in 2013 after he secretly recorded a police officer allegedly threatening to not help if an aggrieved member of the public attacked him.{{cite news |url= http://www.3news.co.nz/Taranaki-clamper-public-enemy-no-1/tabid/1771/articleID/289256/Default.aspx |work= 3 News NZ |title= Clamper: public enemy no 1 |date= 7 March 2013 |access-date= 7 March 2013 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130419195631/http://www.3news.co.nz/Taranaki-clamper-public-enemy-no-1/tabid/1771/articleID/289256/Default.aspx |archive-date= 19 April 2013 |url-status= dead}} It was not the first time the clamper involved had been in the news.{{cite news|url= http://www.stuff.co.nz/taranaki-daily-news/news/8083537/Attempt-to-remove-wheel-clamps-fails |work=Stuff.co.nz |title=Attempt to remove wheel clamps fails| date=15 December 2012 |first=Yvette |last=Batten |access-date=11 July 2014}}

There was a 2017/18 illegal boot operation around Los Angeles where a scammer booted unsuspecting drivers and demanded a high release fee. People were instructed to call 911 and report the scam if they fell victim. It has since ceased, and the scammer was arrested.{{citation needed|date=December 2022}}

File:Wheel clamps Texas.jpg, Denton, Texas]]

In Scotland, local authorities are permitted by statute to clamp, tow, or otherwise remove vehicles. Outside that statutory authority, clamping on private land was found to be unlawful in the case Black v Carmichael (1992) SCCR 709, which held that immobilising a vehicle constitutes extortion and theft. Writing in dismissal of parking contractor Alan Black's appeal to the High Court of Justiciary, the Lord Justice General (Lord Hope) cited case law which said "every man has a right to dispute the demand of his creditor in a court of justice" and himself wrote "it is illegal for vehicles to be held to ransom in the manner described in these charges".{{cite web| url= http://oxcheps.new.ox.ac.uk/new/casebook/cases/Cases%20Chapter%2023/Carmichael%20v%20Black%20(AC).doc |title=Carmichael v. Black, High Court of Justiciary HCJ Appeal, The Lord Justice-General(Hope), Lords Allanbridge and Cowie |publisher=Scottish Court Service |access-date=11 July 2014}}

In England and Wales, The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 criminalised certain wheel-clamping activity on private land without lawful authority from 1 October 2012. This prohibits clamping in many common locations such as supermarket car parks, but clamping is not entirely banned. For example, a railway operator may clamp a vehicle under the provisions of Railway Byelaw 14(4).{{cite web |url= http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/railway-byelaws/railway-byelaws.pdf |title= Railway Byelaws |publisher= Department for Transport, GOV.UK |access-date= 11 July 2014 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140816202559/http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/railway-byelaws/railway-byelaws.pdf |archive-date= 16 August 2014 |url-status= dead}} The act of clamping is still lawful by the police, DVLA, local authority, etc. but not by a private person or company acting on behalf of their own interests on either public or private property. For example, a person cannot lawfully be clamped on property such as a hospital site, private driveway, car park not operated by a local or government authority, etc. The only exception to this is if the clamping company are acting on behalf of a government agency e.g. contracted on behalf of the DVLA.{{Cite web|url=https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/consumer/transport/driving-and-parking/wheel-clamping/when-your-car-can-be-clamped-or-towed-away/|title=Appealing a parking ticket}} To allow landowners to deal with unauthorised vehicles the same statute allows land owners to hold the registered keeper of a vehicle liable for any charges relating to breach of contract under certain circumstances. Landowners who seek to enforce 'Parking Charge Notices'{{Cite web|url=https://www.nathanielcars.co.uk/news/what-are-parking-charge-notices-2019-new-law-on-private-park/|title=Nathaniel Cars :: What Are Parking Charge Notices & 2019 New Law on Private Parking Fees|website=www.nathanielcars.co.uk|date=26 March 2019 }} (contractual payment terms) establish the contract through the use of onsite signage{{Cite web|url=https://www.parkingenforcement.online/|title=Parking Enforcement Signs | Parking Problems | Parking Solution | No Parking | Fine | PCN|website=www.parkingenforcement.online}} detailing the 'conditions'.

File:Clamped car, Ireland.jpg) in Ireland, with note on driver's side window warning the owner not to attempt to drive away.]]

In the Republic of Ireland, clamping in public places is legal under a 1988 amendment to the Road Traffic Act 1961.{{cite web|url=http://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/travel_and_recreation/traffic_and_parking/parking_fines_and_vehicle_clamping.html|title=Parking fines and vehicle clamping|date=20 April 2016|work=Citizens Information|publisher=Citizens Information Board|access-date=6 April 2017|location=Ireland}}{{cite book |chapter-url=http://www.lawreform.ie/_fileupload/Restatement/First%20Programme%20of%20Restatement/EN_ACT_1961_0024.PDF#page=234 |title=Road Traffic Act 1961|date= 2013 |work=Revised statutes |publisher=Law Reform Commission |pages=206–208 |chapter=§101B: Immobilisation, removal etc. of unlawfully parked vehicles|access-date=6 April 2017|location=Ireland}} Clamping in private car parks is widespread but not regulated by statute, and the legality of the practice is unclear. The breaches for which an "immobilisation device" may be fitted under the 1961 act are those specified in sections 35, 36, and 36A of the Road Traffic Act 1994 as amended (respectively "Regulations for general control of traffic and pedestrians", "Parking of vehicles in parking places on public roads", and "Bye-laws for restriction on parking – specified events"{{cite book |chapter-url=http://www.lawreform.ie/_fileupload/RevisedActs/WithAnnotations/EN_ACT_1994_0007.PDF#page=36 |title=Road Traffic Act 1994 |date= 2016 |work=Revised statutes|publisher=Law Reform Commission|pages=28–51 |chapter=Part VI; Regulation of Traffic|access-date=6 April 2017|location=Ireland}}). Regulations under the 1994 act are made by statutory instrument by the minister responsible for transport (currently the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport). Local authorities have delegated the clamping activity to private companies. This contrasts with traffic wardens, who are employees of the authority.

Existing statutory provisions are due to be replaced by the Vehicle Clamping Act 2015, passed as part of the Fine Gael–Labour coalition's 2011 programme for government.{{cite web|url=http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2015/act/13/enacted/en/html|title=Vehicle Clamping Act 2015|access-date=6 April 2017}}; {{cite web|url=https://www.oireachtas.ie/viewdoc.asp?fn=/documents/bills28/bills/2014/5114/document1.htm|title=Vehicle Clamping Bill 2014 [Seanad]|work=Bills|publisher=Oireachtas|access-date=6 April 2017}}{{cite web|url=https://www.kildarestreet.com/debates/?id=2015-01-22a.351|title=Vehicle Clamping Bill 2014 [Seanad]: Second Stage|date=22 January 2015|work=Dáil debates|publisher=KildareStreet.com|access-date=6 April 2017}} The 2015 act regulates private as well as public clamping.{{cite web|url=http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/debates%20authoring/DebatesWebPack.nsf/committeetakes/TRJ2012013100005 |title=Regulation of Vehicle Clamping Industry: Discussion |author=Joint Committee on the Environment, Transport, Culture and the Gaeltacht|date=31 January 2012|work=Debates|publisher=Oireachtas|access-date=6 April 2017}} It also seeks to improve and standardise the level of fines and the appeals process, which have been the focus of public dissatisfaction.

• Barnacle (parking), a device adhered to a windshield of an illegally parked vehicle
• Bicycle lock
• Predatory towing

{{Reflist|30em}}

{{Commons category|Wheel clamps|Wheel clamp}}

• KRQE News 13 Online – [https://web.archive.org/web/20110611193118/http://www.krqe.com/dpp/news/business/business_krqe_albuquerque_bolt_cutters_end_dispute_for_now_200909302243 "Boot Dispute Settled with Bolt Cutters"]
• Reporting Vehicle Immobilisers – in case one was illegally clamped or given no receipt, one can [http://www.the-sia.org.uk/home/licensing/vehicle_immobilising/vi_public_intro.htm report a vehicle immobiliser] to the [http://www.the-sia.org.uk/home SIA] (Security Industry Authority).
• SIA [http://www.the-sia.org.uk/home/licensing/vehicle_immobilising/conditions Conditions of License] for wheel-clampers acting on private land
• [http://www.myfoxla.com/myfox/pages/Home/Detail;jsessionid=4FC5E773D80DC9588DCFB9AD2424DEAD?contentId=4385668&version=5&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=1.1.1&sflg=1 KTTV: "Fox 11 Investigates: 'Getting the Boot{{'"}}]

{{Traffic law}}

Category:American inventions

Category:Clamps (tool)

Category:Parking law

es:Cepo