Wikimedia UK

The first iteration of Wikimedia UK (WMUK) was founded as Wiki Educational Resources Limited (WER) and was incorporated on 14 February 2006, with Alison Wheeler serving as chair of the board and chief executive officer of WER.{{Cite web|title=WIKI EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES LIMITED|url=http://data.companieshouse.gov.uk/doc/company/05708269|publisher=Companies House|access-date=24 September 2012}}{{Cite web|title=Alison Wheeler - Résumé|url=http://www.alisonwheeler.net/|website=AlisonWheeler.net|access-date=24 September 2012}}{{Cite web|title=User:Alison Wheeler|url=https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/User:Alison_Wheeler|publisher=Wikimedia Foundation|access-date=24 September 2012}} WER faced several problems during its time as a chapter organisation that included difficulty in its financing efforts and in its relationship with the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF). Its persistent financial difficulties left the organisation with debts it was unable to pay, and on 28 August 2008 Wheeler announced on the WMUK mailing list that she was planning to call an Extraordinary General Meeting to decide on a proposal to dissolve the group.{{Cite web|title=[Wikimediauk-l] Resignation of Arkady Rose|url=http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediauk-l/2008-August/002078.html|publisher=Wikimedia Foundation|access-date=24 September 2012}} Wiki Educational Resources formally dissolved on 31 March 2009.

Wiki UK Limited was incorporated as a private not-for-profit company under the Companies Act 2006 on 5 November 2008 and, after the WMF terminated recognition of its predecessor, the organisation was officially recognised as a chapter in January 2009.{{Cite web|title=WIKIMEDIA U.K.|url=http://data.companieshouse.gov.uk/doc/company/06741827|publisher=Companies House|access-date=24 September 2012}}{{Cite web|title=Resolution: Approval of Wikimedia UK|url=https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Approval_of_Wikimedia_UK|publisher=Wikimedia Foundation|access-date=20 September 2012}} It applied for official recognition of charitable status to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) the same year, but was denied. HMRC argued that WMUK's purpose of freely disseminating information through Wikipedia would not qualify as charitable unless it included teaching and education as part of its activities. Andrew Turvey, secretary of the WMUK, responded to the ruling by pledging to seek legal advice before appealing the decision.{{Cite news|last=Mason|first=Tania|title=Wikimedia UK denied charitable tax status|url=http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/finance/news/content/3834/wikimedia_uk_denied_charitable_tax_status?|access-date=21 September 2012|newspaper=CivilSociety.co.uk|date=29 May 2009}} Following the rejection of its registration-application by HMRC, Wikimedia UK amended its constitution by adopting new Articles of Association derived from an approved model for charitable status and applied to the Charity Commission for registration as a charity, which was granted in November 2011 once WMUK had met the commission's minimum income requirement of £5,000.{{Cite news|last=Jump|first=Paul|title=Wikimedia's UK charity application to be re-examined|url=http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/news/Article/911135/Wikimedias-UK-charity-application-re-examined/|access-date=21 September 2012|newspaper=Third Sector|date=5 June 2009}} The Charity Commission had initially rejected WMUK's application as an educational charity, but ultimately was able with a little help from WMUK's legal advisers to register it as a library-resource charity.{{Cite news|last=Wiggins|first=Kaye|date=7 November 2011|title=Wikimedia UK granted charity status|url=http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/news/1102747/|access-date=21 September 2012|newspaper=Third Sector}}

File:Jimmy Wales Bristol Public Lecture wp10 6min promo.theora.ogv gave a public lecture at a celebration of Wikipedia's 10th anniversary{{Cite web|url=https://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol|title=Bristol|website=Ten.Wikipedia.org|publisher=Wikipedia 10|access-date=30 September 2013}} in Bristol, organised by Wikimedia UK and other partners.|alt=]]

A year later, Wikimedia UK hosted the three-day Wikimedia Fundraising Summit in Bristol. Christopher Brown of Bristol 24-7 described this as the first time the group had "hosted an event of this importance to the global movement".{{Cite news|last=Brown|first=Christopher|date=7 May 2010|title=Bristol plays host to Wikipedia's global gathering|url=http://www.bristol247.com/2010/05/07/bristol-plays-host-to-wikipedias-global-gathering/|access-date=21 September 2012|newspaper=Bristol 24-7}} The following January, WMUK organised a celebration of the 10th anniversary of Wikipedia's founding at University of Bristol, together with other groups such as the Bristol City Council and Bristol Festival of Ideas. Co-founder Jimmy Wales gave a public lecture at the celebration.{{Cite news|last=Brown|first=Christopher|date=13 January 2011|title=Wikipedia founder in Bristol to celebrate 10th anniversary|url=http://www.bristol247.com/2011/01/13/wikipedia-founder-in-bristol-to-celebrate-10th-anniversary/|access-date=21 September 2012|newspaper=Bristol 24-7|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120327135826/http://www.bristol247.com/2011/01/13/wikipedia-founder-in-bristol-to-celebrate-10th-anniversary/|archive-date=27 March 2012}} During its 2011 annual conference, Wikimedia UK announced its plans to open a permanent office and hire full-time staff within a year.{{Cite news|last=Brian|first=Matt|date=20 April 2011|title=Wikimedia UK to hire full-time staff, aims to increase content quality on Wikipedia|url=https://thenextweb.com/uk/2011/04/20/wikimedia-uk-hires-full-time-staff-aims-to-increase-content-quality-on-wikipedia/|access-date=21 September 2012|newspaper=The Next Web}}

During its efforts to establish a full-time staff, Wikimedia UK was assisted by several groups and individuals such as the president of Wikimedia Deutschland and prospect-us, a recruitment agency specialising in non-profits, who helped vet candidates for the position of CEO.{{Cite web|title=Help us choose our Chief Executive|date=6 September 2011|url=http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2011/09/help-us-choose-our-chief-executive/|publisher=Wikimedia UK|access-date=24 September 2012}} After introducing the final three CEO candidates to the community at a London 'wikimeet' in September, WMUK announced on the 26th of that month that it had chosen Jon Davies, former CEO of Families Need Fathers, for the position.{{Cite web|title=Welcoming our new Chief Executive|date=26 September 2011|url=http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2011/09/welcoming-our-new-chief-executive/|publisher=Wikimedia UK|access-date=24 September 2012}}

File:Development House, London.jpg on 14 November 2011.|alt=]]

In a renewed effort to gain official recognition of charitable status, the board of WMUK had called an EGM to approve amended Objects and related charitable clauses in its Memorandum and Articles of Association pursuant to the advice of their legal team and the Charity Commission.{{Cite news|title=EGM 16th October – Help us become a charity!|newspaper=The Wikimedia UK Blog!|url=http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2011/09/egm-16th-october-help-us-become-a-charity/|publisher=Wikimedia UK|access-date=24 September 2012}} At the meeting, the proposed amendment was passed by a vote of 49 to none.{{Cite web|title=Wikimedia UK one step closer to charitable status|date=27 October 2011|url=http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2011/10/27/|publisher=Wikimedia UK|access-date=24 September 2012}} The Commission registered the company as a charity in November 2011, thereby allowing it to claim the Gift Aid tax incentive from HMRC on its donations from UK taxpayers. In its ruling, the Commission said that WMUK provided a "public resource" by supporting public access to information through Wikipedia. As it did not serve the charitable purposes specifically outlined in the 2006 Charities Act, the ruling referred to a provision of the act allowing for considerations based on case law. Jonathan Burchfield, a partner from the law firm that represented WMUK in its application, stated that the ruling was unprecedented in charity law. During the proceedings, the group had to prove to the Commission that there were tight controls over Wikipedia content to prevent abuse. Following the ruling, Wikimedia UK stated it would have a fundraising effort aimed at raising a million pounds to support Foundation projects. The chapter opened its new offices in central London on 14 November, changing its registered address from its previous location in Nottingham.{{Cite news|last=Mair|first=Vibeka|date=7 November 2011|title=Charity Commission approves promoting Wikipedia as a charitable purpose|url=http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/governance/news/content/10893/wikipedia_uk_membership_arm_gets_charitable_status?topic=&|access-date=24 September 2012|newspaper=Civil Society}}{{Cite web|title=Change of registered office address|url=http://opencorporates.com/filings/100729232|publisher=OpenCorporates|access-date=24 September 2012}}

At its 2012 annual conference on 12 May, public relations experts gave a presentation on their efforts to collaborate with Wikimedia. Board member Steve Virgin described these efforts to work with the PR industry as "a positive first step" in establishing best practices to address concerns about the industry's work and conflict of interest editing on Wikipedia.{{Cite web|title=PR professionals present at Wikimedia UK AGM|url=http://www.prca.org.uk/PRprofessionalspresentatWikimediaUKAGM|access-date=21 September 2012|newspaper=Public Relations Consultants Association|date=15 May 2012}} In response to the controversy surrounding Gibraltarpedia, the Wikimedia Foundation announced that it was taking control of UK-based donations to the organisation and was appointing an independent investigator to inquire into WMUK's governance standards and processes.{{Cite news|last=Williams|first=Christopher|date=2 October 2012|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/9581813/Wikipedia-charity-faces-investigation-over-trustee-conflict-of-interest.html|title=Wikipedia charity faces investigation over trustee 'conflict of interest'|newspaper=The Telegraph|access-date=3 October 2012}}{{Cite news|last=Young|first=Niki May|date=2 October 2012|url=http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/governance/news/content/13485/investigation_into_governance_at_wikimedia_uk_launched|title=Investigation into governance at Wikimedia UK launched|publisher=Civil Society|access-date=27 April 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141104084414/http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/governance/news/content/13485/investigation_into_governance_at_wikimedia_uk_launched|archive-date=4 November 2014}} The review of WMUK's governance, jointly commissioned by the Wikimedia Foundation and WMUK in October 2012, was carried out by Compass Partnership. The report, released on 7 February 2013, found that the charity's reputation was damaged, and that trustees' conflicts of interest were poorly managed.{{Cite web|last=Young|first=Niki May|date=8 February 2013|title=Wikimedia UK trustees have been 'too involved' to effectively govern charity|url=http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/governance/news/content/14428/wikimedia_uk_trustees_have_been_too_involved_to_govern_the_charity|access-date=9 February 2013|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130211023803/http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/governance/news/content/14428/wikimedia_uk_trustees_have_been_too_involved_to_govern_the_charity|archive-date=11 February 2013}}

Wikimedia UK has organised or supported many volunteer efforts to contribute to Foundation projects. One such effort was a month-long competition in February 2010 called 'Britain Loves Wikipedia' aimed at increasing the amount of freely licensed images available for use on Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia. Participants photographed exhibits at participating museums in order to win cash and other prizes.{{Cite web|title=Britain Loves Wikipedia|date=28 January 2010|url=http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2010/01/britain-loves-wikipedia/|publisher=Wikimedia UK|access-date=21 September 2012}} WMUK has sponsored similar events since then, as well as 'edit-a-thons' in order to generate content for Foundation projects.{{Cite news|title=Clock is ticking for scavengers to capture Coventry|url=http://www.leamingtoncourier.co.uk/lifestyle/entertainments/clock-is-ticking-for-scavengers-to-capture-coventry-1-4204492|access-date=21 September 2012|newspaper=Leamington Courier|date=1 September 2012}}{{Cite news|author-link=Maggie Koerth-Baker|last=Koerth-Baker|first=Maggie|title=Wikipedia edit-a-thon at the library of the Royal Society|url=http://boingboing.net/2012/09/05/wikipedia-edit-a-thon-at-the-l.html|access-date=21 September 2012|newspaper=Boing Boing|date=5 September 2012}}{{Cite web|title=Wikimedia UK and JISC join forces for World War One editathon|date=19 July 2012|url=http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2012/07/wikimedia-uk-and-jisc-join-forces-for-world-war-one-editathon/|publisher=Wikimedia UK|access-date=21 September 2012}}

The organisation has collaborations with other institutions such as The National Archives and the British Museum, with event attendees given tours of the institutions so that content can be added to Wikipedia and its sister sites. Wikimedia UK has also worked with the Herbert Art Gallery and Museum in Coventry.

Wikimedia UK also operates QRpedia, which uses QR codes in museums, archives, and other venues, so that people viewing exhibits and collections can instantly see related Wikipedia content on mobile devices, in their preferred language, where available. Rights in QRpedia are owned by Cultural Outreach Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of WMUK. WMUK pledged in 2012 that it would provide support to a six-month programme establishing a full-time paid Wikipedian in Residence position at the British Library, the longest-lasting position of its kind.{{Cite news|last=Geere|first=Duncan|title=Culture The British Library is looking for a Wikipedian in Residence|url=https://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-02/09/Wikipedian-in-residence|access-date=21 September 2012|newspaper=Wired UK|date=9 February 2012}} Its efforts have included support for the Monmouthpedia and Gibraltarpedia projects.{{Cite news|title=The world's first Wikipedia city|url=http://www.gbc.gi/news/79/the-world&|access-date=21 September 2012|newspaper=GBC News|date=18 July 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203003631/http://www.gbc.gi/news/79/the-world|archive-date=3 December 2013}}{{Cite news|title=Gib to be the world's first Wikipedia city|url=http://www.chronicle.gi/headlines_details.php?id=25440|access-date=21 September 2012|newspaper=Gibraltar Chronicle|date=14 July 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120717044838/http://www.chronicle.gi/headlines_details.php?id=25440|archive-date=17 July 2012}}

After obtaining charitable status, Wikimedia UK was exposed to controversies that have received international attention.{{Cite news|last1=McCambridge|first1=Ruth|last2=Lester|first2=Aaron|title=Wikipedia UK and charges of conflicts of interest|url=http://www.nonprofitquarterly.org/management/21040-wikipedia-uk-and-charges-of-conflicts-of-interest.html|access-date=22 September 2012|newspaper=Nonprofit Quarterly|date=21 September 2012}}

One such case concerned the group's previous chair, Ashley van Haeften. In July 2012, Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee ruled that he had violated policies regarding use of multiple accounts and had behaved in an uncivil manner when faced with concerns about sexually explicit material. Although the Committee stated that van Haeften had been subjected to harassment, it also found that he had not been separating harassment from legitimate criticism. The case resulted in him being banned from contributing to the English Wikipedia for an indefinite period.{{Cite news|last=Williams|first=Christopher|title=Chairman of Wikipedia charity banned after pornography row|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/9439046/Chairman-of-Wikipedia-charity-banned-after-pornography-row.html|access-date=21 September 2012|newspaper=The Daily Telegraph|date=31 July 2012}} Despite the results of the case, Wikimedia UK's board supported van Haeften remaining in his position as chair and praised his work with the group. The board's decision was met with criticism from some members of the organisation, who proposed an extraordinary general meeting that would discuss removing him from the board. CEO Jon Davies subsequently announced on 2 August 2012 that van Haeften was resigning from his position as chair to avoid creating division within the organisation,{{Cite news|last=Williams|first=Christopher|title=Wikipedia charity chairman resigns after pornography row|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/9447161/Wikipedia-charity-chairman-resigns-after-pornography-row.html|access-date=21 September 2012|newspaper=The Daily Telegraph|date=2 August 2012}} but he retained his position as a board member and remained chair of the Wikimedia Chapters Association. Chris Keating was subsequently elected to replace him as chairman of the board.{{Cite news|last=Young|first=Niki May|title=Wikimedia UK chair resigns following ban from Wikipedia|url=http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/governance/news/content/13114/wikimedia_uk_chair_resigns_following_ban_from_wikipedia|access-date=21 September 2012|newspaper=Civil Society|date=3 August 2012}}{{Cite news|last=Stothart|first=Chloe|title=Wikimedia UK chair quits after being banned from editing Wikipedia|url=http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/Management/article/1144254/wikimedia-uk-chair-quits-banned-editing-wikipedia/|access-date=21 September 2012|newspaper=Third Sector|date=3 August 2012}}

{{Further|Gibraltarpedia}}

Another member of Wikimedia UK's board of trustees, Roger Bamkin, was exposed to controversy in 2012 due to his involvement with Gibraltarpedia. During the month of August, material about Gibraltar appeared on the front page of Wikipedia 17 times in the "Did you know..." section as a result of the work on Gibraltarpedia. In several instances, Bamkin reviewed these entries and, as he was receiving payment from the government of Gibraltar in connection with his work on Gibraltarpedia, editors raised concerns that the project was using Wikipedia's front page to promote the territory of Gibraltar in exchange for financial compensation.{{Cite news|title=Jimmy Wales 'disgusted' as trustee accused of editing for profit|url=https://www.foxnews.com/tech/jimmy-wales-disgusted-as-trustee-accused-of-editing-for-profit/|access-date=22 September 2012|publisher=Fox News|date=19 September 2012}}{{Cite web|last=Cross|first=Grant|title=Wikipedia contributors debate whether it's okay to pay for posts|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2010117/wikipedia-contributors-debate-whether-its-okay-to-pay-for-posts.html|access-date=22 September 2012 |newspaper=PCWorld|date=19 September 2012 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150906164112/http://www.pcworld.com/article/2010117/wikipedia-contributors-debate-whether-its-okay-to-pay-for-posts.html |archive-date=6 September 2015 }} Gibraltar's government later stated on 21 September that their contract with Bamkin did not involve him being paid for work on Wikipedia but was limited to providing advice on the QR codes and training volunteers.{{Cite news|last=Reyes|first=Brian|title=Govt rejects 'wiki-nobble' claim|url=http://www.chronicle.gi/headlines_details.php?id=26079|access-date=22 September 2012|newspaper=Gibraltar Chronicle|date=21 September 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131020102109/http://www.chronicle.gi/headlines_details.php?id=26079|archive-date=20 October 2013}}

Bamkin's involvement with Wikimedia UK as a board member while performing work on the project prompted further concerns about his position with the group. Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales stated on 17 September that, if the claims about paid editing were well-founded, it was inappropriate for Bamkin to sit on the board of Wikimedia UK given its charitable status. Wales then suggested he resign from the board of the organisation or end his work with the government of Gibraltar. On 20 September, Bamkin resigned from the board of Wikimedia UK following a mutual decision by the board supporting the move in response to the concerns about Gibraltarpedia.{{Cite web|title=Board update|date=20 September 2012|url=http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2012/09/board-update-2/|publisher=Wikimedia UK|access-date=22 September 2012}}{{Cite web|title=Gibraltarpedia: WMUK press release|date=21 September 2012|url=http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2012/09/gibraltarpedia-the-facts/|publisher=Wikimedia UK|access-date=22 September 2012}}

The level of WMUK's participation was also brought into question regarding the situation with Gibraltarpedia. While the organisation does not prohibit paid editing, its support of Bamkin's activities was criticised as potentially inconsistent with its charitable status.{{Cite news|last=Orlowski|first=Andrew|title=Conflict-of-interest scandal could imperil Wikimedia charity status|url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/09/20/wikimedia_uk_scandal/|access-date=22 September 2012|newspaper=The Register|date=20 September 2012}} In a press release following his resignation, the organisation stated that it had provided minimal material support for the effort, that Bamkin had disclosed his commercial interests, and that he had not been involved in the group's decisions regarding the project.

In April 2015, a WMUK employee blocked an account on English Wikipedia he claimed was associated with then Chairman of the Conservative Party Grant Shapps. The employee, a LibDem activist,{{Cite news|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general-election-2015/11555267/Wikipedia-administrator-who-accused-Grant-Shapps-of-editing-pages-of-Tory-rivals-is-Liberal-Democrat-activist.html|title=Wikipedia administrator who accused Grant Shapps of editing pages of Tory rivals is Liberal Democrat activist|newspaper=Daily Telegraph|first=Andrew|last=Gilligan|author-link=Andrew Gilligan|date=22 April 2015|access-date=18 November 2021}} did so after discussing the accusations with The Guardian newspaper using his WMUK email. English Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee censured the editor for his actions, claiming there was "no significant evidence" linking the blocked account to Shapps.{{Cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jun/09/wikipedia-account-at-centre-of-row-not-linked-to-grant-shapps|title=Wikipedia: account at centre of row 'not linked' to Grant Shapps|first=Randeep|last=Ramesh|work=The Guardian|date=9 June 2015|access-date=10 June 2015}} In July Shapps filed a Data Protection Act request, asking for WMUK communications concerning him.{{Cite news|last=Orlowski|first=Andrew|title=Shapps launches probe into Wikimedia UK over self-pluggery allegs|url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/13/grant_shapps_probes_notsorryatall_wikimedia_uk/|access-date=1 September 2015|work=The Register|date=13 June 2015}} WMUK sent Shapps 80 pages of data, but claimed that most emails about the incident had been "deleted in the normal course of business". Shapps described the deletion as "highly suspect".{{Cite news|last=McSmith|first=Andy|title=Grant Shapps unable to unmask mystery Wikipedia contributor|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/grant-shapps-unable-to-unmask-mystery-wikipedia-contributor-10468442.html|access-date=1 September 2015|work=The Independent|date=23 August 2015}} In one email released, a member of the WMUK board states "We should be glad that Shapps has a pretty safe seat, because if he lost his seat, we would be open to the accusation that the charity had acted in a partisan manner during an election period".{{Cite news|last=Payne|first=Sebastian|title=Revealed: Wikipedia's panic over Shapps fiasco|url=http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2015/08/revealed-wikipedias-panic-over-shapps-fiasco/|access-date=1 September 2015|work=The Spectator|date=28 August 2015}} D'Arcy Myers, then interim Chief Executive of WMUK, refused to apologise to Shapps, stating that the charity was "not involved" in the controversy.

The current Board of Trustees for Wikimedia UK can be found on their site.

{{Reflist}}

{{Commons category|Wikimedia UK}}

• {{Official website|http://www.wikimedia.org.uk}}

{{Wikimedia Foundation}}

{{Wikimedian of the Year}}

{{Authority control}}

Category:Charities based in London

Category:Media and communications in the London Borough of Southwark

Category:Organisations based in the London Borough of Southwark

Category:Wiki communities

Category:Wikimedia Foundation

Category:Articles containing video clips

Category:Wikimedia chapters