Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:CtrlXctrlV reported by User:Tvx1 (Result: )

Page: {{pagelinks|Rendang}}

User being reported: {{userlinks|Applaused}}

Previous version reverted to: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rendang&oldid=1280917070 diff preferred],[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rendang&oldid=1280917070 link permitted

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rendang&diff=prev&oldid=1296493824 diff 09:33, 20 June 2025] ]
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rendang&diff=prev&oldid=1296497932 diff 10:04, 20 June 2025
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rendang&diff=prev&oldid=1296530715 diff 14:42, 20 June 2025
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rendang&diff=prev&oldid=1296530715 diff 14:42, 20 June 2025
5. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rendang&diff=prev&oldid=1296642404 diff 08:26, 21 June 2025
6. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rendang&diff=prev&oldid=1296678545 diff 14:29, 21 June 2025

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Applaused&diff=1296678748&oldid=1296658643 link

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Rendang&diff=1296683660&oldid=1296547377 diff

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Applaused&diff=prev&oldid=1296687756 diff

Comments:

Initially user unwilling to discuss in the talk page, and the user also broadcast his/her intention to not discuss about it in an edit summary such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rendang&diff=prev&oldid=1296642477 here]. There multiple editors already engaged in the discussion before the edit warring which the user not responding even though already pinged multiple times Audit2020 (talk) 15:54, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

:Applaused has continued reverting despite exceeding the three-revert rule (3RR), often using the same edit summary repeatedly. On the talk page, the user has used unnecessary capitalisation and language such as “shameless,” “bias one,” and comparisons to theft, which do not align with Wikipedia’s civility guidelines. I respectfully request that an administrator review the situation and provide guidance where appropriate.

:Applaused now insists on reverting the page to a version from January. I have advised the user that any such major amendment should first be discussed on the talk page, in accordance with Wikipedia’s consensus-building processes, rather than unilaterally enforcing personal preferences.

:For reference, the last protected version was version 1280917070, protected by administrator Daniel Case on 17 March 2025 at 05:01 (UTC), while the last stable version prior to the recent dispute was version 1293711063, dated 3 June 2025. On 20 June 2025, Applaused began reinstating significant amendments without first engaging in discussion on the talk page, and the subsequent edits have substantially exceeded the three-revert rule (3RR)--Native99girl (talk) 19:04, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

::{{AN3|b}} – 48 hours for edit warring and personal attacks. EdJohnston (talk) 21:52, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

'''Page:List of culinary herbs and spices

'''User being reported: Ttocserp

Comments:

Ttocserp is engaged in disruptive editing WP:DE - a pattern of editing that blocks progress towards the improvement of an article — in this case the List of culinary herbs and spices. Continuing this disruptive editing is considered as vandalism. WP:VANDAL He/she is making repeated reversions of any edits that are being made to expand and improve the level of detail to this. Alternative ways forward have been suggested, without any engagement at all with the suggestions.

I have given a "Stop edit warring" alert WP:WAR WP:3RR that I believe has been breached.

A request to Chicdat has been made by me to arbitrate and pull a resolution together.

Ttocserp is acting in a completely unreasonable manner by making knee-jerk reversions of edits that are being made to improve this list article and is not making any positive contributions at all.

For further info, please refer to the latest changes to the talk and View history pages of the "List of culinary herbs and spices".

Can you restore the last version of the page before Ttocserp made the significant 3rd reversion and then put a temporary block on further edits until the issue of disruptive editing, that has now constituted vandalism, and edit warring has been resolved.

Please will you step in to resolve this matter.

N.B. This pro-forma, though well-meaning in giving a standard format, is not readily discernible and is not supported with explanatory notes. Can it be restructured to give this?

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [diff]
2. [diff]
3. [diff]
4. [diff]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [diff]

Comments:

• {{AN3|bb|2 weeks}} from editing this article only. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:08, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

{{archive top|1=The edit warring noticeboard is unsuitable for requesting sanctions beyond those already imposed to stop the edit war in a section already resolved with page protection. WP:ANI is the right place to re-open a discussion in case an earlier ANI thread failed to address an ongoing problem. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:03, 22 June 2025 (UTC)}}

Page: {{pagelinks|People's Liberation Army Rocket Force}}

User being reported: {{userlinks|Thehistorianisaac}}

Previous version reverted to: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=People%27s_Liberation_Army_Rocket_Force&diff=prev&oldid=1296298110]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=People%27s_Liberation_Army_Rocket_Force&diff=prev&oldid=1296430119]
2. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=People%27s_Liberation_Army_Rocket_Force&diff=prev&oldid=1296433796]
3. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=People%27s_Liberation_Army_Rocket_Force&diff=prev&oldid=1296759439]
4. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=People%27s_Liberation_Army_Rocket_Force&diff=prev&oldid=1296762882]
5. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=People%27s_Liberation_Army_Rocket_Force&diff=prev&oldid=1296764183]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thehistorianisaac&diff=prev&oldid=1296763067]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thehistorianisaac&diff=prev&oldid=1296767127]

Comments:

The editor is falsely claiming there is no consensus against their edits as @RovingPersonalityConstruct and I have each reverted them three times. Nghtcmdr (talk) 04:01, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

:I would highly suggest you respond to all your misconduct[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#c-Thehistorianisaac-20250618030600-User:NghtcmdrWikipedia:ANI] before shooting yourself in the foot again.

:Your claims of me "making false claims" are utterly false and taken out of context. @RovingPersonalityConstruct has chosen to discuss instead of edit warring. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history#c-RovingPersonalityConstruct-20250620032700-When_to_add_Chinese-language_translations] In contrast, you have been using WP:FALSECONSENSUS and cited an UNFINISHED discussion as "consensus". Additionally, you have, on said discussion, made false claims directed to me. In fact, instead of WP:DROP of our previous dispute you have chose to engage in a WP:HOUNDING campaign against me.

:Again, I would highly hope that the administrator read the full context. I am not the one "faking claims" here, it is simply that @Nghtcmdr has decided to ignore the discussion in regards to the context and engage in a WP:SMEAR campaign against me. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 06:20, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

:See the WP:ANI discussion in regards to you.

:User has been engaging in repeated WP:BLUDGEON, WP:ICANTHEARYOU and WP:NPA, along with multiple false claims.

:Yes, @Nghtcmdr, there is NO consensus, as the discussion [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history#c-RovingPersonalityConstruct-20250620032700-When_to_add_Chinese-language_translations] has not been complete yet. You are taking my quotes out of context, and have also baselessly spread false claims against me. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history#c-Nghtcmdr-20250621174200-RovingPersonalityConstruct-20250620032700] The user has also edit warred before on multiple occasions [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nghtcmdr#c-Simonm223-20250521112400-May_2025], has shown ignorance to policies(per all the evidence on ANI), has directed personal attacks and false claims towards me, and has overall been doing disruptive editing and general civility

Thehistorianisaac (talk) 06:05, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

:: I have protected the page for 3 days due to the edit war. Both parties are encouraged to engage in good faith discussion, and possibly dispute resolution to resolve the disagreement. PhilKnight (talk) 06:34, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

:::@PhilKnight

:::Thank you for the page protection. However, I would recommend more immediate sanctions, as the user has taken my quote out of context(I did the revert since the discussion was still ongoing, which they did not mention at all), and the user has a prior history of edit warring, as shown on his talk page.

:::I would, again, also suggest any available administrators read the ANI discussion in regards to the same editor [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#c-Thehistorianisaac-20250618030600-User:NghtcmdrWikipedia:ANI], as there has been no admin intervention for over several days by now despite said user's misconduct getting worse and worse. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 06:39, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

::::{{u|Thehistorianisaac}}, page protection is a reasonable alternative to blocking both involved editors, which would have included blocking you to prevent this from continuing. Sanctions are preventative, not punitive; the only reason to actually add a sanction would be you indicating that you still believe your edit warring was justified and would continue after the protection expires. To clarify: None of what you wrote either here or in your edit summaries justifies your edit warring. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:17, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::I'm saying past behavior.

:::::Additionally, I did not start the edit war - They skipped discussion consensus and took me out of context. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 12:40, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

::::::@Thehistorianisaac It takes two to edit war, and you were a clear participant. Again, as noted above, sanctions are not punitive for past behaviour; they are to prevent future misconduct. The next three days provide opportunity for good-faith discussion at the talk page. It would be a good idea for both parties to engage in civil discussion there about the desired edits to the article. —C.Fred (talk) 13:11, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::::I'm saying regarding sanctions to said user's other behavior. Multiple editors have discussed this on ANI for the past week, yet there seems to be no response. Additionally, I have been involved in the discussion [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history#c-RovingPersonalityConstruct-20250620032700-When_to_add_Chinese-language_translations], where said user has decided to attack me personally; The main problem was that my edit was reverted without clear consensus, contrary to said user's claim. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 13:26, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

{{archive bottom}}

Page: {{pagelinks|List of African-American United States representatives}}

User being reported: {{userlinks|81.96.52.167}}

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. {{diff2|1296820739|14:05, 22 June 2025 (UTC)}} "Stop reverting. The United States House of Representatives website does not include him as an African American Representative: https://history.house.gov/Exhibitions-and-Publications/BAIC/Historical-Data/Black-American-Representatives-and-Senators-by-Congress/"
2. {{diff2|1296819901|13:57, 22 June 2025 (UTC)}} "No where in the article does it say he is "African American". If you type in "adriano espaillat african american" into google it literally states "he is not considered African American". Reverting once again till a source stating he is African American is found."
3. {{diff2|1296813460|12:55, 22 June 2025 (UTC)}} "Reverting. No sources given that he is African American. If you can find one then it can stay."
4. {{diff2|1296811768|12:39, 22 June 2025 (UTC)}} "Not African American and was not allowed to join the Black Caucus because he is not Black"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. {{diff2|1296813208|12:53, 22 June 2025 (UTC)}} "Caution: Removal of content, blanking on :List of African-American United States representatives."
2. {{diff2|1296815667|13:18, 22 June 2025 (UTC)}} "Please check the discussion at :Talk:List of African-American United States representatives#RfC on the inclusion of Adriano Espaillat"
3. {{diff2|1296820864|14:06, 22 June 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on :List of African-American United States representatives."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. {{diff2|1296815401|13:15, 22 June 2025 (UTC)}} "/* RfC on the inclusion of Adriano Espaillat */ new section"
2. {{diff2|1296816978|13:31, 22 June 2025 (UTC)}} "/* RfC on the inclusion of Adriano Espaillat */ Reply"

Comments:

Have repeatedly tried to bring this up as a conversation on the talk page (including on previous days) however, the IP user seems intend on just reverting their way to a conclusion. Epluribusunumyall (talk) 14:09, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

: You have continuously added an unsourced edition to a wikipedia article. You have been told, multiple times, to find a source for your addition and, as of yet, have not been able to find any. I have added sources, in the talk page, yet you have not. 81.96.52.167 (talk) 14:12, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Page: {{pagelinks|Spain}}

User being reported: {{userlinks|Inherli}}

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. {{diff2|1296830359|15:21, 22 June 2025 (UTC)}} "Reverted 3 edits by JaierRT (talk)"
2. {{diff2|1296805664|11:37, 22 June 2025 (UTC)}} "Reverted 2 edits by JaierRT (talk): Promotional blog and children's encyclopedia are unreliable sources"
3. {{diff2|1296801339|10:49, 22 June 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 1296793967 by JaierRT (talk) A children's encyclopedia and a blog post from a travel booking website are not reliable sources"
4. {{diff2|1296780807|06:57, 22 June 2025 (UTC)}} "Restored revision 1296516760 by Kefren2002 (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. {{diff2|1296833447|15:42, 22 June 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on :Spain."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Spain#Cleanup]

Comments:

• (non-admin comment) Inherli has been blocked twice in the past eight months for edit warring. Largoplazo (talk) 15:54, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
• (non-admin comment) Similar problem with edit warring at Spanish empire on June 16-17. They [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spanish_Empire&diff=prev&oldid=1295877409 made a revert], were invited to discuss it on the talk page via [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Spanish_Empire&diff=prev&oldid=1295879084 a direct ping] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Inherli&diff=prev&oldid=1295879210 a talkback message], they did not join the discussion and instead made two further reverts [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spanish_Empire&diff=prev&oldid=1295968336][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spanish_Empire&diff=prev&oldid=1295974807]. After their third revert they were again asked to join the discussion [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Inherli&diff=prev&oldid=1296001519], they never did. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 15:59, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
• (non-admin comment) Inherli is apparently undisturbed by the notification about this discussion. The latest: [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spain&curid=26667&diff=1296877384&oldid=1296853372] Largoplazo (talk) 22:21, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
• :* (non-admin comment) it is clear that @Inherli has already violated 3RR on Spain and should be blocked from Editing, I'll leave that for a admin to decide on between a temporary block or an Indefinite Block. Untamed1910 (talk) 03:01, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Page: {{pagelinks|21st century genocides}}

User being reported: {{userlinks|82.17.145.49}}

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. {{diff2|1296853805|18:26, 22 June 2025 (UTC)}} "/* Israel */ Unfounded allegations, just accusations from unreliable sources"
2. {{diff2|1296736170|22:54, 21 June 2025 (UTC)}} "/* Israel */ Israeli propaganda"
3. {{diff2|1296722022|20:49, 21 June 2025 (UTC)}} "/* Israel */ Removed accusations of Palestinians genociding Israelis on October 7th only a single biased source (Times of Israel)"
4. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=21st_century_genocides&diff=prev&oldid=1296874631] (as {{u5|2A00:23C7:848B:B801:842B:3B0B:C5C7:510}}
5. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=21st_century_genocides&diff=prev&oldid=1296876792]

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. {{diff2|1296871738|20:54, 22 June 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on :21st century genocides."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

User clearly switched to editing on mobile as {{u5|2A00:23C7:848B:B801:842B:3B0B:C5C7:510}} after receiving a 3RR warning. Note that this topic (Arab-Israeli conflict) is under CTOPS and the user is not permitted to make more than one revert in a 24 hour period. — Czello ^(music) 21:40, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

:now thip {{U|71.212.119.156}} is editing :21st century genocides which the ip is not post to edit. Untamed1910 (talk) 22:58, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

:{{u5|StandardRossoneri99}} has now joined in the edit war. Potentially the same user, as their only edits are to this article. — Czello ^(music) 06:39, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Page: {{pagelinks|Press TV}}

User being reported: {{userlinks|2402:E280:3D27:638:C635:1CD3:C61E:D994}}

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Press_TV&diff=prev&oldid=1296958654]
2. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Press_TV&diff=prev&oldid=1296959105]
3. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Press_TV&diff=prev&oldid=1296959866]
4. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Press_TV&diff=prev&oldid=1296960033]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2402:E280:3D27:638:C635:1CD3:C61E:D994&diff=prev&oldid=1296960027]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2402:E280:3D27:638:C635:1CD3:C61E:D994&diff=prev&oldid=1296960420]

Comments:

Basically keeps attempting to add their own commentary at Press TV. --HistoryofIran (talk) 10:26, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

:{{an3|b|72 hours}} Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:15, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Page: {{pagelinks|List of Kosovo Albanians}}

User being reported: {{userlinks|190.22.213.119}}

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. {{diff2|1297034159|20:06, 23 June 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 1297033908 by TonySt (talk) Restored the corrected names, the last user didn't provide any argument to mantain the old names, stop vandalism or you are will be reported. - Source: https://archive.org/details/video_20230720"
2. {{diff2|1297033321|20:01, 23 June 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 1297032844 by TonySt (talk) Restored the corrected names - Source: https://archive.org/details/video_20230720"
3. {{diff2|1297032760|19:58, 23 June 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 1297032569 by Joyous! (talk) Restored the corrected names."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. {{diff2|1297032848|19:58, 23 June 2025 (UTC)}} "Message about your edit on List of Kosovo Albanians (level 2) (AV)"
2. {{diff2|1297033595|20:03, 23 June 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on :List of Kosovo Albanians."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Please see diffs. I am not an expert in this subject (found this via AV), but I understand this topic is contentious. The subjects in the list are pretty consistently referred to in their own articles as being Kosovar. The name of the article is "List of Kosovo Albanians." The article links (still) Kosovo Albanians in the lead. I believe this is vandalism but I do not have the requisite knowledge to confidently revert more than twice. — tony 20:21, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

• {{AN3|ab}} ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:43, 23 June 2025 (UTC)