Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mzajac/Proposed decision#Motion to suspend

Arbitrators may place proposed motions affecting the case in this section for voting. Typical motions might be to close or dismiss a case without a full decision (a reason should normally be given). Suggestions by the parties or other non-arbitrators for motions or other requests should be placed on the /Workshop page for consideration and discussion.

Motions require an absolute majority of all active, unrecused arbitrators (same as the final decision). See Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Motions to dismiss.

1)

{{Ivmbox|1=Given {{user|Mzajac}}'s absence from editing, the Mzajac case will be suspended for a period of three months and Mzajac will be temporarily desysopped.

Should Mzajac return to active editing on the English Wikipedia during this time and request that this case be resumed, the Arbitration Committee shall unsuspend the case by motion and it will proceed through the normal arbitration process. Such a request may be made by email to {{arbcom-en}} or at the clerks' noticeboard. Mzajac will remain temporarily desysopped for the duration of the case.

If such a request is not made within three months of this motion or if Mzajac resigns his administrative tools, this case shall be automatically closed, and Mzajac shall remain desysopped. If tools are resigned or removed, in the circumstances described above, Mzajac may regain the administrative tools at any time only via a successful request for adminship.}}

: Enacted - KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 20:24, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

:Support:

:# Barkeep49 (talk) 19:36, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

:# KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 19:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

:# firefly ( t · c ) 19:51, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

:# Maxim (talk) 19:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

:# Z1720 (talk) 19:55, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

:# Cabayi (talk) 19:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

:# Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 20:39, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

:# ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

:# Aoidh (talk) 00:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:# The workshop hasn't formally closed yet, so this should take effect on 6 February. Given Mzajac's inactivity, there shouldn't be any rush to close this. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:42, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:# Primefac (talk) 08:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:# No opinion on timeframe for enacting. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

::Proposed. I'm planning on supporting this. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 18:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

::I've slightly changed the wording of the first second sentence. Please revert if you disagree. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:42, 3 February 2024 (UTC){{snd}}corrected at 01:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

::I don't think we should be artificially delaying closures of duly enacted motions. We delay enough naturally as it is. If we are going to delay, I think waiting for the close of the workshop makes little sense and we should instead delay until Feb 9 or one month since Mzajac's last edit. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:::Given that the normal schedule of evidence{{snd}}workshop{{snd}}proposed decision was decided when the case was opened, one could say that we've artificially accelerated the timeframe already by proposing a motion now. This is, of course, an irregular situation given that we're voting to suspend, but I personally think that it would be fairer to the case participants to follow the timeline that we've announced. This is a procedural issue to me and not a substantive issue on the merits, so I haven't made my vote above a placeholder in the opposing section. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

::::Why is it fairer to ask case participants to participate in a case for potentially no reason? For me we're passing this motion so as to not take up the community's time unnecessarily and to be fair to the one editor - Mzajac - with something on the line here. Barkeep49 (talk) 03:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:::::There is no time frame mentioned in the motion, so once the 24h have elapsed this should go into effect. Primefac (talk) 08:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

::::There is no benefit I can see from delaying - I do not think that anything is going to come up in the next three days that will materially affect outcomes. We would seemingly only be delaying for procedural reasons, which is never a good idea IMO. firefly ( t · c ) 10:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:::::+1 KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 16:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

::I am sympathetic to the calls on the talk page for us to not let the POV editing go potentially unaddressed. We definitely have evidence about that submitted, which I haven't examined carefully. I would ask the drafters whether it's sufficient for us to be passing some kind of topic ban in addition to this suspension? Barkeep49 (talk) 17:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:::I'm a little hesitant to do so with a motion alone{{snd}}if we did so, I would question whether we can credibly say that we've suspended the case instead of doing a truncated proposed decision phase in all but name. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

::::Yeah I'm sympathetic to that too - it's one reason I didn't just propose it. But if the case doesn't unsuspend and we had evidence which justified a TBAN I think it's actually going to be harder for one to impose through some other means. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

:::The drafting Arbs are discussing a TBAN motion right now, although imo any Arb can propose one here. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 00:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

::::Given that a TBAN has been imposed by SFR I'm happy enacting the motion now. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 19:33, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

2)

{text of proposed motion}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

A temporary injunction is a directive from the Arbitration Committee that parties to the case, or other editors notified of the injunction, do or refrain from doing something while the case is pending. It can also be used to impose temporary sanctions (such as discretionary sanctions) or restrictions on an article or topic. Suggestions by the parties or other non-arbitrators for motions or other requests should be placed on the /Workshop page for consideration and discussion.

Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")

24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed, unless there are at least four votes to implement immediately. See Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Passing of temporary injunctions.

1)

{text of proposed orders}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

=Proposed final decision=

1) {text of proposed principle}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

2) {text of proposed principle}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

3) {text of proposed principle}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

4) {text of proposed principle}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

5) {text of proposed principle}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

6) {text of proposed principle}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

7) {text of proposed principle}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

8) {text of proposed principle}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

9) {text of proposed principle}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

10) {text of proposed principle}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

2) {text of proposed finding of fact}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

3) {text of proposed finding of fact}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

4) {text of proposed finding of fact}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

5) {text of proposed finding of fact}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

6) {text of proposed finding of fact}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

7) {text of proposed finding of fact}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

8) {text of proposed finding of fact}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

9) {text of proposed finding of fact}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

10) {text of proposed finding of fact}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

11) {text of proposed finding of fact}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

1) {text of proposed remedy}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

2) {text of proposed remedy}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

3) {text of proposed remedy}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

4) {text of proposed remedy}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

5) {text of proposed remedy}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

6) {text of proposed remedy}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

7) {text of proposed remedy}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

8) {text of proposed remedy}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

9) {text of proposed remedy}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

10) {text of proposed remedy}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

11) {text of proposed remedy}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

12) {text of proposed remedy}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

13) {text of proposed remedy}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

{{Arbitration standard provisions}}

:Comments:

:*

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

2) {text of proposed enforcement}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

3) {text of proposed enforcement}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

4) {text of proposed enforcement}

:Support:

:#

:Oppose:

:#

:Abstain:

:#

:Comments:

:::

{{ACImplNotes

|updated = ~~~~ (replace after each update)

|principles =

|findings =

|remedies =

|enforcement =

}}

Important: Please ask the case clerk to author the implementation notes before initiating a motion to close, so that the final decision is clear.

Four net "support" votes (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support") or an absolute majority are needed to close the case. The arbitration clerks will close the case 24 hours after the fourth net support vote has been cast, or faster if an absolute majority of arbitrators vote to fast-track the close.

:;Support

:#

:;Oppose

:#

:;Comments

::