Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Audit Subcommittee/2012 appointments#Candidates
{{shortcut|WP:AUSC/2012}}
The appointment process is now concluded, and the appointment motion has been published below.
{{ArbCom navigation}}
The Arbitration Committee is seeking to appoint at least three non-arbitrator members to the Audit Subcommittee.
The Audit Subcommittee (AUSC) was established by the Arbitration Committee to investigate complaints concerning the use of CheckUser and Oversight privileges on the English Wikipedia, and to provide better monitoring and oversight of the CheckUser and Oversight positions, and use of the applicable tools.
Matters brought before the subcommittee may be time-sensitive and subcommittee members should be prepared and available to discuss cases promptly so they may be resolved in a timely manner. Sitting subcommittee members are expected to actively participate in AUSC proceedings and may be replaced should they become inactive. All subcommittee members are subject to the relevant local and global policies and guidelines concerning CheckUser and Oversight.
The subcommittee is made up of three arbitrators (who typically serve six-month terms) and three at-large members appointed for one-year terms. Applicants must be at least eighteen years old and willing to identify to the Wikimedia Foundation. Active subcommittee members are given the CheckUser and Oversight permissions, and have access to the Arbcom-audit-en, Functionaries-en, Checkuser-l, and Oversight-l mailing lists as well as the {{Oversight email|s=y}} OTRS queue.
Details on the appointment process may be found below.
Appointment process
:Dates are provisional and subject to change
- Applications: 19–31 January
Candidates self-nominate by email to {{NoSpam|arbcom-en-b|lists.wikimedia.org}}. Each candidate will receive an application questionnaire to be completed and returned to the arbcom-en-b mailing list. The completed application should include a nomination statement, to a maximum of 250 words, for inclusion on the candidate's nomination sub-page(s).
- Review period by the Arbitration Committee: 1–7 February
During this period, the Arbitration Committee will review applications, notify the candidates going forward for community consultation, and create candidate sub-pages as necessary. The pages will be transcluded to the Candidates section below prior to the community consultation period.
- Community consultation: 9 February–19 February
The nomination statements are published and the candidates invited to answer standard questions and any additional questions the community may pose. Simultaneously, the community is invited to comment on the suitability or unsuitability of each candidate. These comments may either be posted publicly on the candidates' pages or submitted privately by email to {{NoSpam|arbcom-en-b|lists.wikimedia.org}}. Editors are encouraged to include a detailed rationale, supported by relevant links where appropriate.
- Appointments: by 29 February
The committee shall review all the comments submitted and other relevant factors before finalizing an internal resolution, at which point the appointments will be published. The successful candidates will be required to identify to the Wikimedia Foundation prior to receiving the permissions.
=Appointment motion=
Effective 1 March 2012, {{user|Avraham}}, {{user|Ponyo}}, and {{user|Salvio giuliano}} are appointed as community representatives to the Audit Subcommittee. The period of appointment will be 1 March 2012 to 28 February 2013. {{user|MBisanz}} is designated as an alternate member of the subcommittee and will become a full member should one of the appointees resign their role during the term. The Arbitration Committee thanks all of the candidates, as well as the many members of the community who participated in the appointment process for these roles.
The Arbitration Committee also extends its thanks to {{user|Keegan}} who is expected to remain in office until 31 March 2012.
;Support motion: AGK, Casliber, Courcelles, Elen of the Roads, Hersfold, Jclemens, Kirill Lokshin, PhilKnight, Risker, Roger Davies, Xeno.
;Not voting: David Fuchs, Newyorkbrad, SilkTork, SirFozzie.
For the Arbitration Committee, –xenotalk 17:55, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Candidates
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Audit Subcommittee/2012 appointments/Avraham}}
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Audit Subcommittee/2012 appointments/DeltaQuad}}
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Audit Subcommittee/2012 appointments/MBisanz}}
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Audit Subcommittee/2012 appointments/Ponyo}}
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Audit Subcommittee/2012 appointments/Salvio giuliano}}