Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Arbitration motion regarding Jimbo Wales and Bishonen
{{/Header}}{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|counter = 14
|algo = old(20d)
|maxarchivesize = 200K
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|minthreadsleft = 4
|archive = Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive %(counter)d
}}
Conclusion of CheckUser consultation and change to the Oversight team, April 2025
The March 2025 CheckUser consultation has concluded without any new appointments. The Arbitration Committee thanks everyone who participated in the process.
In addition, the Committee acknowledges the resignation of {{user|GB fan}} from the Oversight team and thanks her for her service.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Sdrqaz (talk) 00:10, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
: Archived discussion at: {{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 52|Conclusion of CheckUser consultation and change to the Oversight team, April 2025}}
Proposed arbitration motions regarding Tinucherian
The Arbitration Committee is considering motions to address WP:COI editing and WP:UPE by {{noping|Tinucherian}}. The motions and discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions#Arbitration motions regarding Tinucherian. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:59, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
: Archived discussion at: {{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 52|Proposed arbitration motions regarding Tinucherian}}
Arbitration motions regarding Tinucherian
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by two motions that:
{{ivmbox|1=1) For repeated and egregious breaches of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines on paid-contribution disclosures and conflicts of interest, {{user|Tinucherian}} is desysopped. Tinucherian may regain the administrative tools at any time via a successful request for adminship.}}
{{ivmbox|1=2d) {{user|Tinucherian}} is admonished for repeatedly editing in a manner inconsistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines on paid-contribution disclosures and conflicts of interest. The question of whether administrative action is needed for violation of WP:COI and WP:UPE is left to normal community processes.}}
For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 18:27, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
: Discuss this at: {{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Arbitration motions regarding Tinucherian}}
Off-wiki misconduct in Palestine–Israel topic area II
The Arbitration Committee has reviewed a dossier of "Tech4Palestine" Discord server related evidence and has determined that, as of this time, the concerns raised have been adequately addressed. The evidence has been retained by the Committee to be used, if necessary, to corroborate additional evidence received. The editors who were brought up in the report are:
- {{user|Samisawtak}} - topic banned by ArbCom
- {{user|Ïvana}} - banned by ArbCom
- {{user|Tashmetu}} - EC revoked, warned for violating ECR
- {{user|Isoceles-sai}} - Result of below
- {{user|ZionistHater}} - Blocked as WP:NOTHERE by {{noping|Drmies}}
- {{user|Discourseofcourse}} - Blocked as WP:NOTHERE by {{noping|Bbb23}}
- {{user|Ummahrican}} - 2 edits 10 months ago - No action necessary, can be addressed if they return
- {{user|Ronnie_larko}} - 218 edits, last edit 4 months ago - No action necessary, can be addressed if they return
- {{user|Sarachicad}} - 32 edits, last edit 10 months ago - No action necessary, can be addressed if they return
- {{user|WamelSlice}} - 8 edits, last edit 8 months ago - No action necessary, can be addressed if they return
- {{user|Rw29014life}} - 12 edits, last edit 11 months ago - No action necessary, can be addressed if they return
- {{user|HadyaWaqfi}} - 1 deleted edit 8 months ago - No action necessary, can be addressed if they return
- {{user|ToTell3Truth}} - 1 edit 11 months ago - No action necessary, can be addressed if they return
- {{user|Shushugah}} - No evidence of misbehavior
- {{user|Baderdean}} - Edits fr.wiki, ArbCom has no jurisdiction
The Committee has been provided additional evidence of off-wiki coordination independent of the Tech4Palestine Discord server. As a result the committee has passed the following motions:
{{ivmbox|1=For violations of Wikipedia's policies on Wikipedia:Canvassing and off-wiki coordination, {{user|Isoceles-sai}} is banned from the English Wikipedia.}}
Support: Aoidh, Cabayi, CaptainEek, Daniel, Elli, KrakatoaKatie, Primefac, ScottishFinnishRadish, ToBeFree, Theleekycauldron
Oppose:
Abstain:
{{ivmbox|1=For violations of Wikipedia's policies on Wikipedia:Canvassing and off-wiki coordination, {{user|GeoColdWater}} is banned from the English Wikipedia.}}
Support: Aoidh, Cabayi, CaptainEek, Daniel, Elli, KrakatoaKatie, Primefac, ScottishFinnishRadish, ToBeFree, Theleekycauldron
Oppose:
Abstain:
The committee encourages the community to continue to provide any private evidence of off-wiki coordination to the committee via email.
For the Arbitration Committee, CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 03:59, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
: Discuss this at: {{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Off-wiki misconduct in Palestine–Israel topic area II}}