Login
Login

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Vote/Mercury

Please Note: Comments longer than two short sentences will be moved to the talk page.

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Candidate statements/Mercury}}

Support

  1. Fred Bauder 01:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  2. Like those below, I oppose the Durova "witch hunts" and the use of admin tools during the dispute was uncalled for. However, no one deserves a drubbing like this, so I'm giving a Moral support. Firsfron of Ronchester 03:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  3. Per Firs ~ Riana ⁂ 04:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Nishkid64 (talk) 00:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  2. AniMate 00:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  3. Tim Q. Wells 00:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  4. Nothing personal, I just do not think he is ready. spryde | talk 00:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  5. Lack of experience with this, shown by the recent Kmweber case This is a Secret account 00:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  6. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 00:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  7. Qst 00:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  8. Oppose. Bad faith and disruption on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive330&oldid=174642231 this and related pages]. Bishonen | talk 00:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC).
  9. Prolog 00:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  10. Actions and demeanor during the Durova issue left much to be desired. RxS 00:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  11. (ec*3) Not ready yet. --Jonathan (T•@•C) 00:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  12. Chaz Beckett 00:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  13. Because of recent misuse of admin tools during the Durova incident including semi-protection of the ANI page. Cla68 00:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  14. --U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 00:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  15. Oppose. Part of the problem rather than a solution of the issue of undercarpet games. --Irpen 00:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  16. W.marsh 00:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  17. 15px Alexfusco5 02:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  18. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 00:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  19. Oppose (my vote explanations) -- Jd2718 00:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  20. Nufy8 00:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  21. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  22. --Duk 00:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  23. Full disclosure: I did not support the Durova witchhunt, but condemned her actions instead. However, Durova did not need an apologist. —Kurykh 00:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  24. east.718 at 00:35, December 3, 2007
  25. – Gurch (talk) 00:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  26. Per involvement in the durova witchhunts.  ALKIVAR™ ☢ 00:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  27. BLACKKITE 00:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  28. - auburnpilot talk 00:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  29. Have concerns. GracenotesT § 00:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  30. Supported an admin over an innocent victim of their harassment. No. • Lawrence Cohen 00:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  31. Per editors above regarding Durova witchhunts. Travb (talk) 00:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  32. Oppose — iridescent 01:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  33. oppose Extended comments moved to talk page. Merkinsmum 01:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  34. absolutely not.—Random832 01:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  35. GRBerry 01:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  36. Way too much of a blind follower :/ --krimpet⟲ 01:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  37. Oppose for lots of reasons, e.g. saying [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive330&diff=prev&oldid=173353592 "don't troll"] to another valued contributor in a good-faith discussion. --Alecmconroy 01:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  38. He protected an AN/I subpage that criticized one of his friends, which of course made the dispute even worse. Kla’quot (talk | contribs) 01:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  39. Recent, obviously inappropriate use of tools. Christopher Parham (talk) 01:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  40. Per above. Miranda 01:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  41. Coredesat 01:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  42. DGG (talk) 02:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  43. Not impressed by answers to questions. --Rodhullandemu (please reply here - contribs) 02:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  44. Especially in these situations, clinging to Durova is like clinging to a sinking ship, and it shows in this vote. Mike H. Celebrating three years of being hotter than Paris 02:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  45. Too new, plus poor judgement. Zocky | picture popups 02:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  46. Cryptic 02:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  47. Rebecca 02:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  48. Strongly per Kla’quot. Dihydrogen Monoxide ♫ 02:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  49. Joe 02:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  50. Sorry, but absolutely not. —bbatsell ¿? ✍ 02:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  51. Bob Mellish 03:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  52. Oppose. --InkSplotch 03:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  53. Húsönd 03:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  54. --Cactus.man ✍ 03:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  55. GlassCobra 03:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  56. No, sorry. Videmus Omnia Talk 03:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  57. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 03:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  58. JayHenry 03:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  59. Oppose Ealdgyth | Talk 03:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  60. Oppose No thanks -Dureo 04:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  61. ViridaeTalk 04:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  62. Oppose - perhaps at another time. Not now. -- Robster2001 04:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  63. Everyking 04:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  64. — xaosflux Talk 04:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  65. Oppose. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 04:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  66. sNkrSnee | ¿qué? 04:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  67. Oppose - despicable behavior at the recent Durova ArbCom case. Isarig 04:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)