Wikipedia:Article Referencing Drive/Archives

:Nominated October 11, 2006

; Support:

1. Rampart 15:24, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
2. HereToHelp 12:50, 15 October 2006 (UTC) How is this unsourced?
3. Kevin_b_er 16:21, 19 October 2006 (UTC) Let's get this article some sources and references.

; Comments:

• This is less obscure than my last suggestion, and it has zero sources! Whee Rampart 15:24, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

:Nominated October 20, 2006

; Support:

1. Fsotrain⁰⁹ 20:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
2. —this is messedrocker (talk) 21:22, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
3. Frazzydee|✍ 04:45, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

; Comments:

This article is a FA from the "brilliant prose" days -- it has no references whatsoever. -Fsotrain⁰⁹ 20:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

: Good gravy! This needs imminent attention. —this is messedrocker (talk) 21:22, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Absolutely! All featured articles should be referenced. Note that it's currently undergoing featured article review. If a note hasn't been left there already, we should ask for the decision to be deferred until we're done with it here. -Frazzydee|✍ 04:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

:As the one who put it up for FAR, I'll do that, Frazzydee. Although the review hasn't had much activity lately in any case. -Fsotrain⁰⁹ 02:42, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

:Nominated November 14, 2006

; Support:

1. Dev920 (Please peer review here.) 20:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
2. BhaiSaab ^talk 21:21, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

; Comments:

• Important article - no citations. A terrible situation that needs correction. Dev920 (Please peer review here.) 20:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

:Nominated November 17, 2006

; Support:

1. ZeWrestler ^Talk 17:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
2. selfworm 22:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
3. JoeSmack ^Talk 07:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

; Comments:

• One of the most important ancient civilizations that contains a lot of unsourced statements and potential original research. Could use a collaboration like this to fix it up. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 17:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

:Nominated October 8, 2006

; Support:

1. JoeSmack ^Talk 03:50, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

; Comments:

• This article has great length and detail by now, but no inline citations and a very pith but lacking 'References' section. It needs help! JoeSmack ^Talk 03:50, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

:Nominated October 9, 2006

; Support:

1. Rampart 23:13, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

; Comments:

• Many unsourced statements, and what references are there need cleaning up or replacement (things like geocities and google caches). Rampart 23:13, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

:Nominated October 21, 2006

; Support:

1. -Gphoto 03:04, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
2. —this is messedrocker (talk) 20:36, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

; Comments:

• Important article, but is lacking cited references. -Gphoto 03:04, 22 October 2006 (UTC)