Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Broadway"

:{{la|"Broadway"}} ([{{fullurl:"Broadway"|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Broadway"}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Little indication of notability, vague mention of a future DVD release date, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, no references to support assertions of notability, those that exist are scant. SGGH ^ping! 12:45, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete It sounds like a typical garage-band, but with animation instead of music. Is there a term for that? Garage-animators? In any event, no notability, no verification, and I could go on. Yngvarr (t) (c) 16:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable. Repetition of names gives it away as vanity. The JPS^{talk to me} 22:37, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. I cannot verify a Chris Mercer[http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1578551/][http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0580251/][http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2570414/][http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1991870/], a Mark Barber[http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1223399/], or a Zac Sutton[http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3111460/] as invloved with any production called Broadway... nor can I confirm Chris Mercer, Dana Anderson[http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0998594/][http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1676075/][http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0026558/][http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0026559/], Brooke Anderson[http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0026460/][http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1741022/][http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2354881/][http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0026461/][http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1960278/][http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2120550/], Jayden Payne[http://www.imdb.com/find?s=all&q=Jayden+Payne&x=3&y=5], or Mark Barber as being in the voice cast of any series called Broadway, nor can I confirm the existance itself of any 2009 TV series by that name[http://www.imdb.com/find?s=all&q=Broadway&x=13&y=9]. The author has edited only this one article[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Funkymonky73]. At the very best, the article is far too premature. At the worst, it's a hoax. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 05:56, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.