Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Not a Whittle or a Stokes"

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:12, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

=[["Not a Whittle or a Stokes"]]=

:{{la|"Not a Whittle or a Stokes"}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/%22Not_a_Whittle_or_a_Stokes%22 Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|"Not a Whittle or a Stokes"}})

:{{la|Whittle and Stokes}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/%22Not_a_Whittle_or_a_Stokes%22 Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Whittle and Stokes}})

Appears to be made up. None of the references added discuss anyone named Whittle or Stokes. Pichpich (talk) 22:56, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Note – Whittle and Stokes is also a part of this deletion nomination. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:37, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Speedy delete as a blatant and evident hoax, along with Whittle and Stokes, and block creator. This nonsense, which has no Google hits or other accessible support at all, represents the only contribution from a new account, which is never a good sign in these situations. I am not actioning this result myself to allow for a second admin opinion but to me the result is clear. Newyorkbrad (talk) 03:29, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:35, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:35, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy delete. Now has five Google hits, two of which are the discussion to delete article. Patent Hoax. Ifnord (talk) 03:44, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Speedy delete (G3 hoax). Tagged. Nothing on Whittle or Stokes, nevertheless where the twain meet. czar ⨹ 02:33, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.