Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013–14 Queen's Park F.C. season

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Whilst there may be routine coverage of individual matches, that should not be synthesised to suggest that there is coverage of the season in any significant manner as a whole. Match reporting occurs at all but the lowest level, what doesn't occur beyond the most notable levels is significant volumes of sourceable prose that discusses the season as a whole or at least in signficant parts. Fenix down (talk) 23:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

=[[:2013–14 Queen's Park F.C. season]]=

:{{la|2013–14 Queen's Park F.C. season}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=2013–14 Queen's Park F.C. season}})

Contested PROD. No evidence of notability; amateur club playing in a fourth tier semi-pro league. Stats article that does not meet WP:NSEASONS criteria for presumed notability and there is nothing remarkable enough about this season to suggest a WP:GNG pass either. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information nor is it a sports almanac. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Delete - amateur team playing in 4th tier of Scottish football, no evidence this season was notable or had any significant coverage. Giant Snowman 13:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment. There's a navbox with 11 other seasons similar to this one. Template:Queen's Park F.C. seasons. –Novem Linguae (talk) 13:57, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

::The 1800s ones might well pass as Queen's Park were the dominant Scottish team at that point so sources may exist offline that would be able to flesh out those articles. The more recent ones, at first glance, appear to have the same issues but I haven't done a WP:BEFORE search on them yet. I thought about bundling them in one AfD but it's better to assess on individual merit. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Delete As per nom, doesn't meet WP:GNG. Hulatam (talk) 16:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment. If the article doesn't meet criteria, then surely the three season articles preceding it should be delted as well? –User:98AL 21:44, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

::I agree. Two of them were already PRODed and I've just PRODed the other one as well. I can't see anything notable about any of them. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:14, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Comment I thought season articles for Scottish league clubs were okay, this is probably the same as any English league two clubs in information etc, so I feel this needs some breathing room. WP:NSEASON is biased and I would vote abstain as I don't really want to see these deleted. Govvy (talk) 11:16, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete Per nom. Too detailed for this level of football. Average home league attendance=418 Nigej (talk) 07:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Weak keep The level of secondary coverage at this level isn't especially substantial, but it is consistent. It's harder to make a full keep vote because of that, but I think the nomination is badly flawed because it says there's "nothing remarkable enough about the season to suggest a WP:GNG pass." This has nothing to do with GNG! News sources such as the Glasgow Times and the BBC consistently reported on the season, and although the prose on this is light, it could definitely be expanded through WP:RS. Many seasons articles need to be deleted, but I'm not sure this is one of them. SportingFlyer T·C 12:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete per WP:NSEASONS. Number 5 7 13:47, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.