Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Challenger Pulcra Lachiter Biella – Singles

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Overall consensus is to Keep, I would also ask {{u|BeenAroundAWhile}} that in future they'd expand on there reasonings otherwise there AFDs will be Speedy Kept per WP:SK1. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 18:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

=[[2015 Challenger Pulcra Lachiter Biella – Singles]]=

:{{la|2015 Challenger Pulcra Lachiter Biella – Singles}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2015_Challenger_Pulcra_Lachiter_Biella_%E2%80%93_Singles Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|2015 Challenger Pulcra Lachiter Biella – Singles}})

Not encyclopedic. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 06:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

:Keep - The article is stub, not yet completed. but it may be improved. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:13, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

:Keep - Should we delete all draws for challenger tournaments? I do not see much difference between this and other draws linked in 2015 ATP Challenger Tour. Or between this article and the article for last year's tournament: 2014 Challenger Pulcra Lachiter Biella – Singles. --Kompik (talk) 06:24, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Keep – Nominator has no reason mentioned (or a pretty bad one). Such articles are allowed and good to go. Kante4 (talk) 14:02, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.