Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4st 7lb

:{{la|4st 7lb}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/4st_7lb Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|4st 7lb}})

This song was not released commercially as a single, it is merely one of many tracks from The Holy Bible, and the only supportive references are based around the album, not the song. By this logic of inclusion in the Wikipedia database, any song from The Holy Bible could have an article created for it simply because The Holy Bible is notable. Lachlan Foley (talk) 10:03, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

• Keep: Plenty of notability established in sources that are not primarily talking about the album. I have just added ten references, most of these being cite books. Obviously no decent WP:BEFORE was done here. Nom's argument that the song was not released as a single is irrelevant to its notability and the deletion discussion. -- Sam ^Sing! 13:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
• Keep Even before Sam added 10 refs (only 10?!), this would pass WP:GNG. Recommend the nom reads WP:BEFORE before continuing with AfD nominations. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 14:32, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
• Keep: Per the sources recently added. As mentioned, the fact that it wasn't released as a single is irrelevant to the song's notability. Kokoro20 (talk) 13:27, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.