Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/67th Expeditionary Signal Battalion

:{{la|67th Expeditionary Signal Battalion}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/67th_Expeditionary_Signal_Battalion Stats])

:({{Find sources|67th Expeditionary Signal Battalion}})

Most if not all of the content is copied from other sources such as [http://www.military.com/HomePage/UnitPageHistory/1,13506,104515%7C967487,00.html this]. C1776M^Talk 11:12, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

• Withdrawn by nominator- As discussed below copyright violations should either be CSD or brought to Wikipedia:Copyright_problems after reading the guidelines there {{db-copyvio}} appears to be the correct option. C1776M^Talk 17:01, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

• Comment- The page creator is a new user with several empty new pages using the same template. Perhaps Move to User:Cameronarndt/sandbox without redirect would be more appropriate so they can work on the articles more? C1776M^Talk 11:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:13, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:13, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:13, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

• Keep. It certainly needs a rewrite, but battalion-sized units are generally considered to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:45, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
• Comment I agree it's notable. The concern is WP:COPYVIO though, not notability. C1776M^Talk 14:48, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
• Then why bring it to AfD? AfD is for deletion on grounds of notability, not cleanup. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:28, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
• The wp:afd page clearly states that the process is for any page that requires deletion under WP:Deletion_policy so I disagree that it is only for notability. However, I do see that it also states users should list copyright violations on WP:Copyright_problems so I will list it there. Thanks! C1776M^Talk 16:53, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.