Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AVN Award for Best Actor

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=AVN Award for Best Actor}}

:{{la|1=AVN Award for Best Actress}}

:{{la|1=AVN Award for Best Supporting Actor}}

:{{la|1=AVN Award for Best Supporting Actress}}

:{{la|1=AVN Award for Male Performer of the Year}}

:{{la|1=AVN Award for Female Performer of the Year}}

:{{la|1=AVN Award for Male Foreign Performer of the Year}}

:{{la|1=AVN Award for Female Foreign Performer of the Year}}

:{{la|1=AVN Award for Transgender Performer of the Year}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=AVN Award for Best Actor}})

All of this information is present on the range of articles dedicated to the specific AVN award ceremonies.

I'm not sure why these awards need their own individual articles, when the same information is more concisely handled already on wikipedia.

I am nominating the following articles

AVN Award for Best Actor

AVN Award for Best Actress

AVN Award for Best Supporting Actor

AVN Award for Best Supporting Actress

AVN Award for Male Performer of the Year

AVN Award for Female Performer of the Year

AVN Award for Male Foreign Performer of the Year

AVN Award for Female Foreign Performer of the Year

AVN Award for Transgender Performer of the Year

Heythere95 (talk) 05:37, 8 November 2022 (UTC) — Heythere95 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Awards, and Sexuality and gender. • Gene93k (talk) 06:10, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:19, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

• Keep all, these are cross-transactional to the individual award ceremonies, and in that sense are no different from the Academy Award for Best Actor or Tony Award for Best Actor in a Musical lists. They present information in a manner unique to the presentation of individual events. BD2412 T 03:57, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
• Keep all, the pages are holistically informative about the popular segments of one of the longest running major award show that provides a peek in to the world of adult entertainment. Rim sim (talk) 08:20, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
• Keep all. For awards programs which present awards across multiple categories, such as the Oscars or the Grammies or this, the most user-friendly way of presenting the information is to have an article about each year's ceremony which lists all the winners and nominees in that specific year across all categories that were presented that year, and an article about each category which lists all the winners and nominees in that specific category across all years in which it was presented. These aren't in conflict with each other, because they serve two different purposes — by-year and by-category lists are complementary to each other, not redundant with each other, because they cross-reference different subsets of information on different organizing criteria. The grounds for deleting these would be "the AVN Awards aren't notable enough for us to have any articles about them at all", not "by-category articles aren't necessary if by-year articles also exist", but the nominator isn't claiming the former. Bearcat (talk) 13:55, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
• Keep All - These nominations stink of WP:DONTLIKE they are sourced and well sourced, simply being publications which are disliked does not diminish the reliability or verifiability of these publications. Porn awards exist and they are notable, individual awards exist and they are notable. These collection of the winners of specific awards is standard, and verifiable. Claiming duplication of information is absurd, because by that metric every single award page for every single individual actor would need removing. That would be absurd. This is the most user friendly way of presenting these awards and it is bonkers to decrease the ease of accessibility of information. Sparkle1 (talk) 11:04, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
• Keep all without prejudice towards a new filing by an actual Wikipedia user. I do not put any weight or credibility on someone who creates an account, files an AfD within one minute, then completes a multi-part tagging process of a dozen articles in 20 minutes. Zaathras (talk) 15:24, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
• Why delete this page? You’re worried about head shots and words? I hate to break the news, but the kids aren’t watching “Leave it to Beaver” anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olaf Laphammer (talk • contribs) 20:52, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
• Keep all WP:PRESERVE Lightburst (talk) 00:04, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.