Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adelaide Red Blue Eagles

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:42, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

=[[Adelaide Red Blue Eagles]]=

:{{la|Adelaide Red Blue Eagles}} ([{{fullurl:Adelaide Red Blue Eagles|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adelaide Red Blue Eagles}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable amateur football team. The club plays in a purely social competition, the sources provided are either not independent of the subject or are only of minor relevance. This is a disputed PROD, reasons can be found on the article talk page. Mattinbgn\^talk 10:59, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 11:00, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —Mattinbgn\^talk 11:04, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
{{la|Adelaide Red Blue Eagles}} is not a notable amateur football team playing in a legitimate competition. I dispute the claim that it is non-notable, pointing to an article in The Murray Valley Standard as proof of the clubs notoriety, which has a circulation of almost 4,000 (ABC audited). In regards to the SAASL being a purely social competition, the SAASL is the level of football (soccer) below the three professional leagues of South Australia which are run by the FFSA. Many players in the league are payed money to play, making it a business exchange. Social soccer is playing in the park with mates. How can this article on a SAASL team be any different to that of the article of SAASL team FC Adelaide — Preceding unsigned comment added by Babny002 (talk • contribs)
Delete as per Mattinbgn comments. Michellecrisp (talk) 14:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Delete clearly not notable. I just speedy deleted FC Adelaide under CSD A7. Nick Dowling (talk) 00:35, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
This team is a "notable team" see http://saasl.com.au/frmShowPage.aspx?strPageName=clubs&intDivisionID=61&intClubID=183. Furthermore it has a first team and a reserve team. With the reserves currently still in a competitive cup, see http://saasl.com.au/frmShowpage.aspx?strpagename=cup_matches. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.104.75.200 (talk) 03:08, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Delete getting mentioned in a local paper with a circulation of 4,000, and having a reserve team do not assist its non-notable status. Murtoa (talk) 03:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
The team also employs a coach who previously competed in the National Soccer League, (predecessor to the A-League). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.104.75.200 (talk) 07:08, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:17, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Delete Not notable. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 08:17, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Giant Snowman 14:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Delete Insignificant coverage by reliable third-party sources. Fails WP:N. Five Years 06:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Delete per nom. – Pee Jay 11:57, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.