Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Sexton

Verbose, aggrandising article about a perhaps notable director of an entertainment company. Requires cleanup at the very least. Hynca-Hooley 01:04, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

• weak keep - definately clean up needed --Oscar Arias 01:16, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• weak keep per Oscar. Bucketsofg 02:42, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Emphatic Delete. The man is not individually notable in any way. A mention of his name in the Lion's Gate article is more than enough. He's a VP and not the main man at his company. Note that we do not have any articles for his superiors, nor should we, unless they were individually notable for some reason. Oscar and Buckets, what is your rationale? the.crazy.russian (T) (C) (E) 03:17, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

::Honestly, mostly gut feeling. I've seen much less notable people in wikipedia articles. At least he's a VP in the entertainment industry. -Oscar Arias 09:45, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

:::Oscar, gut feeling is not a criterion, thank God, in WP:N. If even you see a less notable person, do us all a favor, propose him for deletion. Let's get WP up to standard of citability in scholarly works and judicial opinions. the.crazy.russian (T) (C) (E) 01:37, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, nontrivial industry figure, slash text heavily. Monicasdude 03:23, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep and cleanup. --Terence Ong 05:37, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 14:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Crzrussian. Moe Aboulkheir 15:13, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as Crazy argues. ProhibitOnions 21:58, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Russian Funky Monkey 22:25, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Russian --Ardenn 03:16, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Russian. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 21:23, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Russian Cursive 22:51, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Russian. Reyk 19:45, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.