Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amelia Rose

=[[Amelia Rose]]=

:{{la|Amelia Rose}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amelia Rose}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Amelia Rose}})

Disputed prod but still don't think the article passes WP:ENT. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:31, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete per too soon. Her career is nearly non-existant[http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3483176/], and fails WP:ENT. The "findsources" above and her common name give an uncountable number of false positives. She may achieve notability in the future, but no... just not yet. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:16, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete She might become notable later - and good luck to her - but at this point she does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability. --MelanieN (talk) 23:49, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete per MelanieN and MichaelQSchmidt. Risker (talk) 20:26, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.