Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anca Ramsden

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Anca Ramsden}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Anca Ramsden}})

Non-notable and almost certainly autobiographical. – Ploni (talk) 16:32, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Psychology, and Australia. Ploni (talk) 16:32, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:49, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable psychologist. Note the lists of books on the page is misleading-- it's not lists of "influential books" by the subject, but rather lists of books that (are claimed to have) influenced Ramsden--the claim of which is all unsourced. Page reads like LinkedIn/CV, which Wikipedia is not. I couldn't find any RSs in database search of Australian and NZ newspapers (wider and deeper than Google. Fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:AUTHOR, WP:PROF. Cabrils (talk) 02:48, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
• Delete the sources are not indepth about the subject. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 06:17, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
• Delete Doesn't meet WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NPROF, and is more like WP:RESUME. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:04, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
• Delete. Undoubtedly UPE spam from a sock farm. Create a user and talk page. Leave it for a bit then develop spam in the sandbox. Hijack an existing redirect to try fool new page patrollers. Move to actual place then retarget the resulting redirect back to the original target. This is not accidental behaviour from a well meaning new editor. It is gaming the system from an experienced shill. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:20, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.