Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Hedberg
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 10:10, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
=[[Anton Hedberg]]=
:{{la|Anton Hedberg}} – (
:({{Find sources|Anton Hedberg}})
Non-notable teenage hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he meets the GNG. Has played *exclusively* in youth competitions. Another in a string by creator falsely asserting that he's played in the SEL. Ravenswing 03:24, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:26, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:26, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete A search failed to turn up any sources to meet GNG. Also fails NHOCKEY. -DJSasso (talk) 19:39, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Perhaps the least notable player page Dolovis has ever created. A search of Highbeam and Google news archive doesn't even reveal trivial mentions as part of routine coverage, let alone anything resembling a GNG pass. As with many other his articles, the claim that the player appeared in the Swedish Hockey League is false. It is evident that Dolovis is simply going down Eliteprospects.com's lists and creating these sub-stubs without checking that the player has even appeared in a game beforehand, let alone meets Wikipedia's notability thresholds. This is basically gross incompetence. Resolute 00:00, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Delete. Fails NHOCKEY and GNG. None of the leagues are considered a top professional league according to WP:NHOCKEY/LA. Patken4 (talk) 21:18, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.