Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apple&Stone
=[[Apple&Stone]]=
:{{la|Apple&Stone}} ([{{fullurl:Apple&Stone|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apple&Stone}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
The sources for this music are its own website, a fansite, myspace, and facebook. Unless someone can find a real reliable source, it should be deleted. Chutznik (talk) 18:55, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - nominator appears correct, there's no indication of notability available here, nor are there decent sources. Tony Fox (arf!) 22:36, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Speedy Delete per criterion G12. The page is a word-for-word copy of [http://www.youtube.com/appleandstone their YouTube page].-- Nomader (Talk) 22:43, 6 July 2009 (UTC)- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:14, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Apple%26Stone&diff=301114437&oldid=300646349 removed] the apparent copyright violation. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:33, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Apple&Stone article updated with new content and picture. Hope it is up to Wikipedia standard for now. More updates will follow as they occur. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thepitcho (talk • contribs) 21:04, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
:*I've reviewed the content, and I still have to vote delete, although it's no longer a copyright violation (per Paul's work). I looked through websites about the band, and though they've worked with ATB, I still don't think they're notable enough to pass WP:BAND. If the singles had charted, they'd be notable by now, but until I see the reception that their debut album garners, I'm going to have to say delete. -- Nomader (Talk) 00:04, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.