Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azerbaijan beylerbey-dom

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 18:26, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Azerbaijan beylerbey-dom]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Azerbaijan beylerbey-dom}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Azerbaijan beylerbey-dom}})

Literally every sentence of this article is filled with violations of WP:VER and WP:RS. Source #1 is a Russian-language link that doesn't cite sources. Idem for #2. Source #3 is published by the government of the Azerbaijani Republic (see also; Media freedom in Azerbaijan), and is filled with the typical anti-Iranian/anti-Armenian pseudo-historic ramblings (see also; Historical_negationism#Azerbaijan), such as (page 21); "For this reason, all surnames beginning from ”melik” are Albanian". The phrase " According to the Istanbul Treaty, the Safavids lost most of Azerbaijan (both south and north side of Azerbaijan)", citing Maeda, an accredited historian, blatantly fails WP:VER when I decided to check the source. And this is just the tip of the iceberg. - LouisAragon (talk) 17:06, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

  • Support per the points above. This is just pure revisionism. --HistoryofIran (talk) 19:15, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete per the disastrous sourcing brought up by nom. I suppose WP:TNT could eventually apply, but definitely not with this research as the bedrock. OhioShmyo (talk) 15:06, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. - Kevo327 (talk) 21:46, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete The article is heavily based on unreliable and revisionist sources. Plus it seems the few reliable citations such as Iranica are falsified or misrepresented; e.g. look at citation #10 and compare the claim with the [https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/iran-ii2-islamic-period-page-5 original content]. I'd suggest some editors review all created articles[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?target=Acdc88&namespace=0&tagfilter=&newOnly=1&start=&end=&limit=50&title=Special%3AContributions] by the author of this article. They may suffer from very same issues. Wario-Man talk 02:26, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.