Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BICs Markets

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:20, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

=[[BICs Markets]]=

:{{la|BICs Markets}} ([{{fullurl:BICs Markets|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BICs Markets}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Self-promotion of new unnotable theory, no independent coverage Rcawsey (talk) 14:20, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED DELETION: Qualifying the book as non notable is personal and subjective opinion that is hard to justify. In view of the recent crisis, this book has become particularly relevant for the issues at the root of the crisis as well as the prescription to address it. The credibility of the book is independently sourced and properly referenced using the WIPO website at http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?wo=2003107137. the World Intellectual Property Organization is the most authoritative body in the world on intellectual property matters. A review of the International Preliminary Examination report issued Oct 1, 2004 in the documents tab associated with the patent publication WO2003107137 show that all 273 claims made in the application are found admissible as New, involve an Inventive Step and are Industrially Applicable.

It is not a "marketing campaign" but a mere recitation of independently sourced material of the highest credibility

Bics (talk) 17:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy delete - self-advertising of non-notable theory. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:44, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Speedy delete (G11) as spam. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basis Instrument Contract. MuZemike 23:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Speedy delete - G11 added. — neuro^(talk) 13:34, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Speedy delete per G11. Daniel Case (talk) 15:53, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete per WP:VSCT. Creator of the theory is citing his own non-notable book in an attempt to promote his own fringe theory. All four letters (the V, S, C, and T) are all there... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.