Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battalion 609

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:11, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Battalion 609]]=

:{{la|Battalion 609}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Battalion_609 Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Battalion 609}})

Unsure this passes WP:NFILM. First and last references are the only coverage beyond a mere cast list and release date, sources 2, 5 and 8 are duplicates of source 9. Perhaps WP:TOOSOON. SITH (talk) 16:45, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Keep. {{reply to|StraussInTheHouse}} New references have been added and article should not be deleted as its an upcoming film based on Indo-Pakistani war. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FossilNeil (talk • contribs) 17:19, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

:I am not speculating anything. Everything has been cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FossilNeil (talk • contribs)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:35, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:25, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:46, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

KEEP Per WP:HEY. FOARP (talk) 08:17, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.