Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Jhain

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. but I don't have a lot of confidence in this article. And I don't understand the rationale "Keep per Hashid Khan" as that is the name of the nominator who was asking for this article to be deleted. it might warrant another visit to AFD in the future but right now, the nominator is accused of being a sockpuppet and there is no support for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:26, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Battle of Jhain]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Battle of Jhain}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Battle of Jhain}})

This article clearly fails WP:GNG & full of WP:SYNTH mess and WP:OR. There is not any battle named as the "Battle of Jhain", the name of the battle is fabricated Hashid 09:05, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

:Keep- A battle happened in Jhain during Jalal-ud-Din Khalji. The book '[https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.458719/page/n550/mode/1up?q=Jhain The History of India]' mentions it. [https://books.google.co.in/books?redir_esc=y&id=QXtDAAAAYAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=Jhain Medieval India, Volume 3] also talks about the campaign. [https://books.google.co.in/books?redir_esc=y&id=n4gcAAAAMAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=Jhain Early Chauhān Dynasties] also mentions it. Though it was not called as 'Battle of Jhain' by any historian so it could be renamed. Changeworld1984 (talk) 09:49, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

::@Changeworld1984 Battle of Jhain isn't any official battle, it was a minor conflict during Jalal-ud-Din Khalji's Ranthambore campagin which turned out to be unsuccessful Hashid 13:30, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

  • If it’s not called “battle of Jhain” by any historians what are we calling it that for? What do they call it? Mccapra (talk) 13:17, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:02, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

:Keep: Article passes WP:GNG and is well cited with reliable sources. Article suffers less from WP:SYNTH or WP:OR and more from non-encyclopedic writing style, which isn't means for deletion. An example would be "Some sources say ..." John.mark1956 (talk) 03:38, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.