Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Miège

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was

keep. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:23, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

=[[Bernard Miège]]=

Unsourced contested PROD. Prod, which called for sources or deletion, was removed and no refs added. Not notable or barely notable academic. Academics publish a lot. That doesn't increase their notability. Viridae ^Talk 06:06, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Keep meets WP:N by a wide margin [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Bernard+Mi%C3%A8ge]. Hobit (talk) 06:53, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 08:07, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 08:10, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Keep. A former university president who has received at least two honorary doctorates, and probably four. Please, please remember WP:BEFORE. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:06, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Keep per WP:PROF #6 and possibly also #1. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:56, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Keep for reasons above. An ill-researched nomination. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:19, 21 January 2010 (UTC).
Keep Refs added. Clearly notable for his "cultural industries" works. Not even a close call here. Collect (talk) 02:03, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.