Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Better Because, LLC

=[[Better Because, LLC]]=

:{{la|Better Because, LLC}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Better Because, LLC}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Better Because, LLC}})

Maybe it's just me, but it seems like this new company has good PR people who have managed to get "aren't they great?" pieces into a number of media outlets in the last few months. I don't think that makes them encyclopedically notable. What does the community think? NawlinWiki (talk) 21:25, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete GNews/GBooks/GScholar return zero hits. GHits returns some sources which initially look interesting but, per what I believe to be nom's point, a review of them reveals that most (and possibly all) of these are PR-type placements and not actual independent coverage that could confer notability. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 22:45, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete man this should have been deleted when the article was created as WP:CSD#A7 and/or WP:CSD#G11. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:38, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete. Advertising: a Seattle based multi-media company founded in 2009 with a mission to inspire an international movement to motivate others and bring out the positive in their lives. Through its book, merchandise, and other projects, Better Because has an unmistakably upbeat outlook and are reaching out to people and asking them, “Why is your life better?” - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:41, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.