Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Devin Jones

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This has to be a first. This AFD page was actually created by an editor arguing to "keep". (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:45, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

=[[:Bob Devin Jones]]=

:{{la|Bob_Devin_Jones}} - (View AfD)(View log)

— 173.171.245.177 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

No reason is given for putting this article up for deletion. Thus, the deletion template should be removed. --RossF18 (talk) 02:31, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:59, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:46, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:46, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Keep - Has good coverage in RS. Gnews shows 562 hits for "Bob Devin Jones" from 1984 till 2010.--Sodabottle (talk) 21:10, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Keep - Everything is sourced and notability is met. The template still doesn't list reasons for deletion. --RossF18 (talk) 22:40, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Keep Notability well established. Evalpor (talk) 23:57, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Keep and close per established notability. My question is how is it that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/173.171.245.177 an anonymous IP with 4 edits] nominates something for deletion? Somone forget to log in? Was this someone's test edit? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:50, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.