Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boots (Ian McNabb album)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Ian McNabb . MBisanz talk 00:18, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

=[[Boots (Ian McNabb album)]]=

:{{la|Boots (Ian McNabb album)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Boots_(Ian_McNabb_album) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Boots (Ian McNabb album)}})

Fails WP:NALBUMS. CaptainScreebo Parley! 19:29, 28 October 2012 (UTC) CaptainScreebo Parley! 19:29, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

  • weak keep currently has one notable source, the classic rock article, but the other two are primary sources.
  • Merge to Ian McNabb; one source isn't enough to be notable, and this sort of fan-only release, not through an established record label, is unlikely to be widely reviewed or otherwise notable. But it should still get a mention. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:45, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Merge; Happy to Secede but i would like the content to remain in the current form (not be condensed) --Jonie148 (talk) 19:00, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:40, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:44, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

  • Keep or Merge to Ian McNabb or a new Ian McNabb discography article. Deleting all these articles Ian McNabb articles isn't going to improve the encyclopedia. He's clearly a notable artist, and we should preserve encyclopedic content. A separate discography article with more detail than is currently in the McNabb article might be the way to go. --Michig (talk) 07:08, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.