Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brotiger
=[[Brotiger]]=
And some more pseudo-linguistic hoaxery. Joyous (talk) 19:37, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete not much more to say; just read it Robdurbar 19:44, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
Save this article: it is an obscure yet significant linguistic development that needs to be documented. A failure to do so would fly in the face of Wikipedia's very purpose
T. Blake Littwin
---
Save the Brotiger!
-Andrew: Boston,MA
- Delete, (no supporting evidence, appears spurious) and kindly ask anon IP users to register and make progress with supportive edits instead of using their first appearance on a VfD. Also: wax my mustache. --Icelight 22:32, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete hoax. JamesBurns 08:11, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
Save this entry At first glance, this entry seems like a farcical excercise in wordplay. But after consulting with a few of my colleagues, I came to the realization that 'brotiger' is a genuine linguistic development. Please reconsider.
Regards, Prof. Carl J. Harris (Utah State College)
- ^^^ Heh. Anyway, delete, hoax/unverifiable. Dcarrano 14:45, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.