Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brown Lands

[http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Brown+Lands%22+%2BTolkien+-wikipedia+-dictionary+-encyclopedia&hl=en&lr=&start=270&sa=N Is this fictional area of land noteworthy]? Is any of the content within this article encyclopedic? --GRider\^talk 22:28, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Don't abuse VFD to make a point. Create something like Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earth as a child of Wikipedia:WikiProject Fictional Series if you wish to help remove the number of Middle-earth articles here in a productive way. Jordi·✆ 23:19, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Middle-Earth-cruft. --Carnildo 00:13, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Merge or keep Middle-Earth-cruft. Kappa 02:03, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• WP:POINT. See also: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Google test. —Korath (Talk) 02:04, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)
• This nomination is not correctly formed. Please read the instructions. Chris 02:42, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nn fancruft. ComCat 03:03, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Merge as minor concept. And people who nominate this should already know the answer from precedent, and be bold and just merge it rather than putting it on VfD. Radiant_* 09:35, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge, mentioned in passing, cannot expand. Average Earthman 12:20, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Ignore nomination as made made bad faith, otherwise keep or merge - SimonP 15:31, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, and expand. Megan1967 02:23, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Expand how? The article already contains the sum total of all knowlege on the subject. --Carnildo 07:03, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Ignore. WP:POINT. Jayjg ^(talk) 19:59, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, no less notable than many of the other Middle Earth articles. Bryan 00:45, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.