Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Built NY

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Built NY}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Built NY}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Built NY}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz Read! Talk! 03:52, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

=[[:Built NY]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Built NY}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Built NY}})

Fails WP:NCORP. There are a handful of independent product reviews, see [https://the-gadgeteer.com/2011/09/21/built-neoprene-tote-bag-for-13%E2%80%9D-apple-macbook-pro-review/], [https://www.engadget.com/2008-01-07-built-ny-prepping-neoprene-laptop-back-pack.html?guccounter=1], and passing mentions like [https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-lunch-boxes/]. Alas, nothing substantial, and the article has seen some COI activity. Ovinus (talk) 03:52, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.