Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CMoy (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (NPASR) (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter¹²³ (notify) @ 20:25, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

=[[CMoy]]=

AfDs for this article:

:{{la|CMoy}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/CMoy_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|CMoy}})

Does not seem to be a really notable design. Besides some DYI web pages and forums, there isn't much else on this trivial application of an opamp. There are various other proposed designs on tangentsoft's website (ppa etc.), but luckily those don't have Wikipedia pages. I'm not prejudging all DYI designs as non-notable; for example the gainclone is mentioned in some books. But the CMoy does not seem to pass the WP:N standard. December Rush (talk) 10:49, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (yarn) @ 20:50, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

keep: As I am building this one a second time and consider it a really well-documented design, I have to say it deserves its right to have an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.181.12.140 (talk) 01:24, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (articulate) @ 18:29, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Keep: Delicious sugar-flavored crack like this is why I come to Wikipedia. (If there's a problem with the article, fix it.)--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 05:35, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|96%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michig (talk) 08:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.