Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cage Rage 20

:{{la|Cage Rage 20}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cage_Rage_20 Stats])

:({{Find sources|Cage Rage 20}})

The article contains very little in the way of well-sourced prose as required by WP:SPORTSEVENT. There appears to be little coverage of the event(s) outside of WP:ROUTINE fight announcements, results, and fight videos. TreyGeek (talk) 21:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:

:{{la|Cage Rage 21}}

:{{la|Cage Rage 22}}

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. TreyGeek (talk) 21:37, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

• Delete all These articles contain little prose (articles consist mainly of fight results) and give no indication of why they're significant sporting events. A fight card that has a championship bout for a second tier organization does not show notability (even winning such a championship does not show notability). Papaursa (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

• Delete All There's no indication that any of these events pass WP:SPORTSEVENT or that any of them have coverage other than WP:ROUTINE sports reporting. CaSJer (talk) 21:43, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
• Delete all on the basis of WP:SPORTSEVENT. LlamaAl (talk) 01:59, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.