Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassidy Cruise

:{{la|Cassidy Cruise}} ([{{fullurl:Cassidy Cruise|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassidy Cruise}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Notability concerns - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Elsa Baye (talk) 03:10, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Dismas|^(talk) 04:04, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete Could be speedied for completely failing to assert notability. Resolute 03:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• An earlier [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cassidy_Cruise&oldid=273774930 rev] claims that she was Penthouse Pet, likely not speediable, although the ref is a deadlink. -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 04:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• Strong Delete The veritable cosmic epitome of what isn't notable. A vast cornucopia of unnotability. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 04:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete Little in the way of sources. Trilobyte fossil (talk) 04:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. I rarely vote against a fellow editor knowing the feeling of your research getting deleted, but this is way off. Needs expansion and references added very soon.--TitanOne (talk) 05:11, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

• Delete Even being a Penthouse Pet of the month does not establish WP:N (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.