Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Champavati Fort Chachaura

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Guna district. Star Mississippi 20:45, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Champavati Fort Chachaura]]=

:{{la|1=Champavati Fort Chachaura}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Champavati Fort Chachaura}})

No sources given, only one I could find with a WP:BEFORE was [https://www.naidunia.com/madhya-pradesh/guna-for-the-first-time-in-state-queen-champawati-fort-will-be-preserved-and-renovated-by-state-archeology-department-2657927 this], of which I'm not sure of the reliability. I don't think it meets GNG, but I'm not good at navigating Hindi-language sources so I hope to be positively surprised if there are other sources on it. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

:Noting that it likely doesn't meet WP:GEOFEAT as it only appears to be protected on a state, rather than national, level. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:26, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: Previously moved to draftspace as :Draft:Champavati Fort Chachaura and then recreated in mainspace. Johnj1995 (talk) 18:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Madhya Pradesh-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
This is unsourced, only two sentences, and shouldn't be in mainspace. I'm happy deleting or draftifying on those grounds without looking to see if it passes GNG without any prejudice towards its recreation. SportingFlyer T·C 19:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
:It has already been draftified and recreated, so can't really be draftified again per WP:DRAFTOBJECT. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 20:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
::That is for unilateral draftifications, I don't think a draftify result here would be unilateral. SportingFlyer T·C 20:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Merge: Not enough WP:SIGCOV for a standalone article. This should be merged with Guna District. Prof.PMarini (talk) 00:00, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.