Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandrawal

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Alpha Quadrant ^talk 16:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

=[[Chandrawal]]=

:{{la|Chandrawal}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Chandrawal}})

Firslty, the notability isn't established by the sources. Secondly, the article contains POV and has claims to awards and accolades which are not sourced. Thirdly, the editor who created it shares a name with the music composer Pi (Talk to me! ) 17:45, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Keep This was the first hit film in the Haryanvi language. Even after more than 30 years, English language newspapers in India discuss this landmark film. The Hindu called it a "big success". The Times of India called it "famous". Express India called it "popular". The Tribune in Chandigarh called it a "golden jubilee hit". Cullen328 (talk) 05:19, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Keep - [http://www.hindu.com/2010/10/03/stories/2010100359290700.htm Hindu] as noted above, and {http://www.indianexpress.com/news/second-innings/661605/ India Express] covering the sequel that is to be made to this polular movie. As a non-English film released in 1984, sources on the Internet are not going to be easily found. These articles demosntrate that the film has been noted. -- Whpq (talk) 14:49, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Keep If a major newspaper in India things its notable, then it is. Dream Focus 22:37, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Keep Notable in India is notable enough for en.Wikipedia, and correction of tone is an addressable issue. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 12:20, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.