Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charge of the Model T's

:{{la|Charge of the Model T's}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Charge_of_the_Model_T%27s Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Charge of the Model T's}})

No evidence of notability Legacypac (talk) 04:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  10:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  10:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

• Keep a crappy film that received just enough coverage to meet WP:NF. Like many here, I am restricted to only online sources, but this [https://books.google.com/books?id=iSxeO8fM8e4C&pg=PT320&dq=%22Charge+of+the+Model+T%27s%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=X3G1VPm6I5XZoAS5yYGgCg&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false book] reveals that other than what I already found to improve the article, there was coverage by Associated Press and Daily Oklahoman. I saw the WP:POTENTIAL of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charge_of_the_Model_T%27s&diff=641968246&oldid=634132286 original] stub and now [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charge_of_the_Model_T%27s it's better]. I think it's now a keeper. {{u|Legacypac|Nominator}}?? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 19:54, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Withdraw - not something I'd go see but you proved a little notability. Legacypac (talk) 01:48, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

:Thank you much, and I doubt I'd ever go out of my way to watch it either. {{smiley}} Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 05:09, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.