Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherokee D' Ass (2nd nomination)

:{{la|Cherokee D' Ass}} – (View AfDView log){{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/reports/afd/{{urlencode:Cherokee D' Ass}}.html|2=Afd statistics}}

:({{Find sources|Cherokee D' Ass}})

Fails WP:PORNBIO, WP:ENT, and the GNG; no nontrivial GNews/GBooks hits. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 01:17, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

• Delete entirely unreferenced BLP, subject is not notable and as the nom suggests this article clearly fails WP:PORNBIO. This article appears to be used solely for promotion and I am inclined to believe the author has a conflict of interest. --§Pumpmeup 09:31, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 18:15, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 18:15, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

:({{Find sources|Cherokee Dass}})

:({{Find sources|Cherokee (porn star)}})

• Delete as failing WP:GNG and WP:PEOPLE, as 2 brief mentions in articles[http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Cherokee+D%26%2339%3B+Ass%22] do not allow building of a proper BLP. She might be prolifc,[http://www.adultfilmdatabase.com/actor/cherokee-dass-32414/] but she does not have Wikipedia notability. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:26, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
• Delete - notability not established, no sources. TFD (talk) 21:01, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.