Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Matthew Sciabarra

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 22:09, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Chris Matthew Sciabarra]]=

:{{la|1=Chris Matthew Sciabarra}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Chris Matthew Sciabarra}})

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:NACADEMIC, no reliable sources found in my WP:BEFORE. Most sources that focus on Sciabarra in this article were written by Sciabarra himself and are thus not WP:INDEPENDENT, the other good sources are all about his book Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical. This book of his is (maybe) notable, but he certainly isn't. There is no need to merge this article into the book's page, considering that the book's article already talks about Sciabarra in its "background" section, I'm asking for a deletion. SparklyNights 21:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Libertarianism, and United States of America. SparklyNights 21:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:47, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Comment. No time to search for reviews but his other two books each have >100 citations in GS, so may well have them, contributing to notability under WP:AUTHOR. Espresso Addict (talk) 12:42, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Keep per WP:AUTHOR. One of many bad nominations of libertarian/randroid thought created recently by SparklyNights. I'm sure they are acting in good faith in trying to clean up a crufty area of Wikipedia but they need to swing less wildly and pay more attention to WP:BEFORE: the notability of a topic does not depend on the bad state of our article on it. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:39, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Keep per David Eppstein. Sourcing is sufficient to pass WP:AUTHOR. Sal2100 (talk) 20:10, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.