Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christos Charalambous

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Christos Charalambous]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Christos Charalambous}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Christos Charalambous}})

The sole weak claim to notability is [https://int.soccerway.com/players/christos-charalambous/381159/ 5 mins of football] 5 years ago, after which he played in the lower divisions for a bit then seemingly disappeared altogether. There is plenty of consensus that such a claim to notability can be challenged and WP:GNG can and should take priority in such cases. With that in mind, a [https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22%CE%A7%CF%81%CE%AE%CF%83%CF%84%CE%BF%CF%82+%CE%A7%CE%B1%CF%81%CE%B1%CE%BB%CE%AC%CE%BC%CF%80%CE%BF%CF%85%CF%82%22&t=h_&ia=web Greek language source search] and a [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22%CE%A7%CF%81%CE%AE%CF%83%CF%84%CE%BF%CF%82+%CE%A7%CE%B1%CF%81%CE%B1%CE%BB%CE%AC%CE%BC%CF%80%CE%BF%CF%85%CF%82%22&hl=en&tbm=nws&ei=UEmvYcOGNZXE8gL0k46ACA&start=0&sa=N&ved=2ahUKEwjD7tjDztH0AhUVolwKHfSJA4A4ChDy0wN6BAgBEDg&biw=2133&bih=1041&dpr=0.9 Google News search] returned no coverage about this particular Charalambous. There is a Dialogos journalist of the exact same name which distorts the results. Also, please don't be fooled by articles like [https://themasports.tothemaonline.com/apochairetise-ki-o-christos-charalampoys/ this one]; this relates to a 45 year old coach so clearly not the same man. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:47, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Delete Per Nomination--dashiellx (talk) 13:31, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:43, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete: Per nom and without prejudice to change vote to Keep if significant coverage is later found. For my search, I was unable to find WP:SIGCOV for the subject, noting that someone with searching skills for Cypriot/Greek sources might uncover things I was unable to. Until that point, my vote stands as delete. GauchoDude (talk) 14:51, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:14, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.