Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cockpuppet

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Punkmorten 13:06, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

=[[Cockpuppet]]=

No information is given as to why a cockpuppet is a notable item requiring a Wikipedia article. If he provides reference etc ones mind might be changed. --File Éireann 21:40, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Delete I speedied this one originally. I see nothing that would make me change my mind. Dipics 21:45, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

:Its not patent nonsense though if you check the definition. I got stick from the main author of the article over that! Mind your terminology!--File Éireann 21:48, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Delelte per nom. RedRollerskate 21:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Comment The term is in common usage. Here are some links

http://www.linkswarm.com/modules.php?name=XForum&file=post.reply&fid=19&tid=1862&repquote=r%7C31202

http://forums.megatokyo.com/index.php?showtopic=1712020&st=25Neuropean 21:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Apologies for the outrageous language used on some of these sites Neuropean 21:50, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Delete per WP:NEO Danny Lilithborne 22:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Delete We99 23:04, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete, fails WP:NEO. --Coredesat 23:37, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete, WP:NOT a guide to slang or jargon. User Neuropean may want to consult Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Barno 00:01, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete as neologism.--Jersey Devil 00:27, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete as per above. --Ragib 18:31, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.