Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/County (China)

=[[County (China)]]=

:{{la|County (China)}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|County (China)}})

Incomplete disambiguation (WP:INCDAB) which serves little purpose when the content is already at County, and elaborated on more fully. The page is also unsuitable as a redirect due to the fact it would point to two different sections. Redirecting to one could be seen as controversial. France3470 (talk) 04:45, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. France3470 (talk) 04:47, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

  • I don't see the County article elaborating more fully, instead it refers to the lengthy article Counties of the People's Republic of China for details. There is also a disambiguation page at County (disambiguation). IMHO, the County (China) info may be helpful for some casual users, and it does not hurt. Shenhemu (talk) 11:04, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • As an incomplete disambiguation, this will need to be merged into County (disambiguation) if kept, and will exist only as a redirect to the appropriate section. I don't see much use to that, but I don't see much harm to it either. Merge and redirect to section. bd2412 T 02:24, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

::I suppose my thought was why put it on the disambiguation page when it is already the primary topic at County, covered by the sections County#China and County#Republic of China (Taiwan)? Surely that rather undermines the concept of disambiguation in the first place. France3470 (talk) 08:06, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.