Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D'Arcy D'Souza

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:12, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

=[[:D'Arcy D'Souza]]=

:{{la|D'Arcy D'Souza}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/D%27Arcy_D%27Souza Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|D'Arcy D'Souza}})

Much of it is written per WP:OR or the subject hasn't received coverage in reliable source. No coverage on his death in 2009. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 17:04, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:43, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. –Miles Edgeworth Talk 00:36, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

  • Keep Some references have been [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=D%27Arcy_D%27Souza&type=revision&diff=807588989&oldid=807060221 added] by other users since the nom. Mar4d (talk) 10:08, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete -- He was clearly well thought of, but still NN. Long service does not create notability. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:56, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - My condolences to the Fr.'s parishioners and friends. Fails GNG; NOTMEMORIAL. Carrite (talk) 13:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete falls fall short of the typical standard we hold for articles on clerics. Plenty of priests are long serving, and the overwhelming majority of them aren't notable even if we have coverage of it: its run of the mill. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:06, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.