Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel M. Labow

:{{la|Daniel M. Labow}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Daniel_M._Labow Stats])

:({{Find sources|Daniel M. Labow}})

Only sources are to press releases, directories, and other insignificant publications. WoS gives 338 citations and an h-index of 9. These are data from March 2013, if somebody thinks it important, I can get more up-to-date ones, although I think this is so far from our usual standards that it is impossible that this would have been improved enough in a year. GScholar gives similar medium-low citation counts. Does not meet WP:ACADEMIC or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 17:34, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 17:35, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

:Comment I'm neutral about his notability, but here's another reliable source: [http://www.esquire.com/features/patient-zero-1213-6] Jinkinson talk to me 18:44, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:01, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:01, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC).
• Delete. Being good at your job does not notability make. JFW | T@lk 14:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
• Delete. Short of academic and overall notability.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 14:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.