Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Datalink Computer Services incident (2nd nomination)

:{{la|Datalink Computer Services incident}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Datalink_Computer_Services_incident_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Datalink Computer Services incident}})

I brought this to AFD a few years ago, based on general lack of notability and WP:NOTNEWS. The prior AFD was closed due to "no consensus." While recognizing it as mere news, the closing admin noted "there is no clear consensus that this news item will not last." Now, three years later, it seems pretty clear that it was, after all, just news. (I realize notability is not temporary; but recognizing that an event is not notable may not be clear up close in time to the event.) TJRC (talk) 23:31, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

• Delete - I see no continued coverage, or the lasting impact that was expected from the first AFD. -- Whpq (talk) 14:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
• Delete- Nothing came of it, so it's just another esoteric story.Smallman12q (talk) 13:03, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
• Delete - Bizarre indeed, but not notable. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 01:42, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.