Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Forman

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:43, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

=[[David Forman]]=

:{{la|David Forman}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Forman}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|David Forman}})

Unsure of notability. I declined a BLP PROD because I found sources, but they're hardly the most reliable. :( HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

:({{Find sources|Dave Forman}})

:({{Find sources|David Foreman}})

:({{Find sources|Dave Foreman}})

Weak keep Stuntmen did not used to be notable - they used to be invisible - but these are different times. The depth and variety of his experience, and his winning of an award at the Taurus World Stunt Awards, should qualify him as a keeper. --MelanieN (talk) 03:19, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Keep Agree with above - winning an award for his practice makes him notable.Cptcrow (talk) 00:07, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Keep per career and awards. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:04, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.