Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desamuduru (soundtrack)

:{{la|Desamuduru (soundtrack)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Desamuduru_(soundtrack) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Desamuduru (soundtrack)}})

Redundant with content already present at Desamuduru. CSD A10 applicable had it not just been ignored since 2015. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:02, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:03, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:03, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:03, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

• Delete: I was about to say why it was not bold'ly redirected to parent article, but then I saw article's history. Soundtrack has no independent notability and relevant sourced content is already covered in the parent article -- which is no where nearer to what we call an extensive article. Anup [Talk] 23:05, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
• Delete – No need of a separate article for film's soundtrack that hasn't gained much popularity. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 01:10, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
• Don't delete - Desamuduru is the most successful film and album of 2007. Is it okay if the content in the parent article is removed?PhysicsScientist (talk) 01:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

::Yes! Its perfectly okay to remove content from parent article. I propose to make Desamuduru (cast), Desamuduru (plot), Desamuduru (trivia), Desamuduru (Production) and Desamuduru (references) as separate article because Desamuduru is the most successful film of 2007!! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

:::: Soundtrack is enough.PhysicsScientist (talk) 08:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

::::: That's so illogical. We also need a separate article for external links as this was the most successful film of the year. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 02:51, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

:::::{{ping|User:Dharmadhyaksha}}That's rightly said!Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 13:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

• Delete, unnecessary split. Cavarrone 11:29, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
• Strong Delete-Soundtrack has no independent notability and the relevant content is already covered in the parent article -- which is not an extensive lenghthy/tedious article.Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 16:23, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.