Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divergent (film)

=[[Divergent (film)]]=

:{{la|Divergent (film)}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Divergent_(film) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Divergent (film)}})

WP:TOOSOON. Fails WP:NF and WP:GNG. No principle photography has begun. Should be a Redirect to Divergent (novel) until such time as it meets notability standards. Sidenote, creator submitted to AfC process, then apparently reviewed it himself and moved to article space (not that this is against policy, but as an explanatory note). GregJackP Boomer! 04:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:05, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Redirect to Divergent_(novel)#Adaptation. It's a given that the movie adaptation will inevitably be notable, but at this point in time it hasn't started filming and doesn't meet the standards of WP:NFF. (That even if the movie looks like it'll be notable, there's no such thing as a "sure thing" in the movie world and until filming begins, the movie shouldn't have its own article.)Tokyogirl79 (talk) 13:07, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

:*Since the original article creator supports this, I'm going to boldly redirect the article to the film page- no need for a long and drawn out AfD.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 13:08, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.